| 25A896 |
Homewood Associates Inc., et al. v. Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia |
Georgia |
2026-02-06 |
Application |
|
constitutional-challenge land-use-restriction municipal-ordinance property-rights regulatory-taking takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 25-523 |
United Water Conservation District v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2025-10-29 |
Pending |
Amici (7) |
fifth-amendment government-appropriation physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking water-rights |
Whether the government's appropriation of water that a person had a property right to use is analyzed as a physical taking, rather than a regulatory t… |
| 25-414 |
The Sunshine Group, LLC v. City of Dana Point, California, et al. |
California |
2025-10-06 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
constitutional-violation due-process ex-parte notice-requirement property-rights regulatory-taking |
The City of Dana Point "red tagged" Petitioner's motel and then had a receiver appointed to oversee its rehabilitation without ever providing notice o… |
| 25A228 |
United States v. Darby Development Company, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2025-08-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-agency fifth-amendment government-action regulatory-taking statutory-authority takings-clause |
Whether an administrative agency's unauthorized regulatory action that exceeds its statutory authority can constitute a compensable taking under the F… |
| 24-1276 |
California Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl v. Stanislaus County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-06-16 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-challenge due-process facial-challenge property-rights regulatory-taking statute-of-limitations |
Whether a statute of limitations for facial constitutional challenges begins to run solely from the date of enactment, or whether each day of continue… |
| 24-1055 |
William Becker, et al. v. City of Hillsboro, Missouri |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-04-07 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review constitutional-law land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-taking takings-clause |
Whether the Court of Appeals improperly declined to recognize an unconstitutional regulatory taking under Nollan, Dolan, and Lucas precedents |
| 24-908 |
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-02-24 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
economic-use land-use-restrictions lucas-doctrine property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness |
Whether a claim that a local ordinance effected a regulatory taking upon enactment remains unripe until the landowner asks the local government for pe… |
| 24A746 |
Kingston Kohr, LLC v. City of Irvine, California |
California |
2025-01-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-scrutiny demolition eminent-domain fifth-amendment property-rights regulatory-taking |
Whether a city's mandatory demolition of a fire-damaged building constitutes a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause when a pro… |
| 24A435 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2024-10-31 |
Presumed Complete |
|
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test regulatory-taking |
Whether a regulatory restriction that substantially interferes with a business's economic expectations constitutes a compensable taking under the Fift… |
| 24-487 |
James G. Collins v. Monterey County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
|
economic-deprivation government-regulation lucas-doctrine penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Does a regulatory taking under Lucas require complete economic deprivation, and how do recent Supreme Court precedents impact the Penn Central takings… |
| 24A418 |
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2024-10-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment investment-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Whether a state regulation constitutes a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment when it substantially interferes with a private business's invest… |
| 24A150 |
GHP Management Corporation, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-08-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
covid-19 eviction-moratorium fifth-amendment municipal-code regulatory-taking takings-clause |
Whether a municipal eviction moratorium during the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause that r… |
| 23-1337 |
Baldwin County, Alabama, et al. v. Mike Bordelon, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-06-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process economic-use fair-market-value fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central property-rights regulatory-taking takings temporary-prohibition temporary-taking |
Does the temporary prohibition of a specific project or use constitute a compensable regulatory taking, regardless of the availability of other econom… |
| 23A1004 |
Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-05-10 |
Presumed Complete |
|
federal-claims fifth-amendment government-interference property-rights regulatory-taking tucker-act |
Whether the Fifth Amendment and Tucker Act permit a takings claim against the federal government for alleged regulatory interference with private prop… |
| 23-1199 |
Joanne Moskovic v. City of New Buffalo, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-05-07 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process michigan-zoning-enabling-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings short-term-rental substantive-due-process zoning zoning-ordinance |
Whether the Appellate Court erred in finding that Petitioner's use of her home as a short-term rental is not a residential use |
| 23-7349 |
Scott Zirus v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure constitutional-challenge due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure housing-assistance mandamus property-rights regulatory-taking standing venue-transfer |
whether-mandamus-relief-is-available |
| 23-1148 |
G-Max Management, Inc., et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-23 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (5) |
due-process land-use-regulation landlord-tenant penn-central penn-central-test physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings rent-regulation takings |
Whether New York's rent-regulation laws effect physical takings |
| 23-1103 |
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch, LLC, et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
constitutional-rights declaratory-relief equitable-tolling fifth-amendment just-compensation regulatory-taking statute-of-limitations |
Question not identified |
| 23-7070 |
Riley Thornock, et ux. v. Bedford County, Virginia |
Virginia |
2024-03-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-justice civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection governmental-overreach property-rights regulatory-taking |
Does the government's attempt to compel an individual out of their established residence or property warrant the appointment of a court-appointed atto… |
| 23-1045 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-03-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is… |
| 23-935 |
Gene Gonzales, et al. v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al. |
Washington |
2024-02-27 |
Denied |
Amici (13)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-property due-process exclusionary-rights landlord-tenant landlord-tenant-relationship physical-taking physical-takings property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings |
Whether an ordinance that compels the possession of property by an unwelcome occupant is a categorical physical taking |
| 23A671 |
Carolyn J. Florimonte v. Borough of Dalton |
Pennsylvania |
2024-01-22 |
Presumed Complete |
|
continuing-trespass fifth-amendment government-overreach property-rights regulatory-taking storm-water-disposal |
Whether the government's repeated intentional flooding of private property constitutes a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause … |
| 23-490 |
Enrique Jevons, as a Managing Member of Jevons Properties LLC, et al. v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-11-08 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
covid-19 declaratory-judgment eviction-moratoria fifth-amendment just-compensation regulatory-taking standing takings-clause |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in dismissing a challenge to Washington State's COVID-19 eviction moratoria as moot |
| 22-1191 |
Thomas Gearing, et al. v. City of Half Moon Bay, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
abstention civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act due-process eminent-domain federal-jurisdiction fifth-amendment forum pullman-abstention regulatory-taking takings |
Whether federal courts may deprive takings claimants of their chosen forum by invoking the prudential Pullman abstention doctrine to require them to f… |
| 22-1170 |
335-7 LLC, et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-06-02 |
Denied |
Relisted (13) |
civil-rights due-process economic-value just-compensation landlord-tenant property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control takings takings-clause |
Does the New York Rent Stabilization Law effect a per se physical taking, a confiscatory taking, or a regulatory taking? |
| 22-1130 |
74 Pinehurst LLC, et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-05-19 |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (13) |
civil-rights due-process landlord-tenant lease-renewal physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control rent-stabilization takings tenant-protection |
Whether a law that prohibits owners from terminating a tenancy at the end of a fixed lease term, except on grounds outside the owner's control, consti… |
| 22-1095 |
Community Housing Improvement Program, et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-05-10 |
Denied |
Amici (12) |
affordable-housing civil-rights due-process government-regulation housing-law physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control takings |
Whether the provisions of the New York Rent Stabilization Law that prevent a property owner from regaining exclusive possession and control of her pro… |
| 22-872 |
Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim |
Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or … |
| 21-8246 |
Richard D. Bostwick v. 44 Chestnut Street, Wakefield, Massachusetts, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2022-06-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-immunity reasonable-accommodation regulatory-taking standing substantive-due-process |
Whether the Remedies, Procedures and Rights set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act are unconstitutional |
| 21-719 |
Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights communications-act confiscatory-rates due-process federal-circuit federal-communications-commission rate-regulation regulatory-taking takings |
Whether the lower court's holding that a regulatory taking claim based on confiscatory rates must be made at the Federal Communications Commission den… |
| 21-244 |
Taylor & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-18 |
Denied |
|
5th-amendment economic-impact fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking takings |
Does the fact that the property is generating profits on the date of taking satisfy the economic impact requirement to find a regulatory taking under … |
| 21-217 |
Marcy Britton v. Tim Keller, Mayor of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-08-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process inverse-condemnation penn-central-test property-rights qualified-immunity regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioner's Federal Takings claim and claim for inverse condemnation against Defendants with prejudice at the … |
| 20-885 |
Next Energy, LLC v. Illinois Department of Natural Resources |
Illinois |
2021-01-04 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
due-process fifth-amendment hydraulic-fracturing mineral-rights oil-and-gas permit-moratorium property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings shale-oil shale-oil-leases takings |
Whether an unauthorized moratorium on permits needed to drill wells, together with onerous regulations and procedures that exceeded the term of the le… |
| 20-323 |
John S. Barth v. City of Peabody, Massachusetts |
First Circuit |
2020-09-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights compensation due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment municipal-ordinance property property-rights regulatory-taking takings |
Did municipal denial of permission to rebuild a home effect a taking of private property, where an ex post facto ordinance prohibited all other econom… |
| 20-54 |
Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. Hawaii Land Use Commission |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-22 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process economic-impact lucas-standard lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central penn-central-factors property-rights regulatory-taking takings temporary-taking |
Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling effectively eliminates property owners' ability to recover for temporary regulatory takings conflicts with other co… |
| 19-1252 |
Callan Campbell, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
final-decision government-action property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings statute-of-limitations takings tucker-act |
Does the Tucker Act's statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiffs … |
| 19-1136 |
Chong Yim, et al. v. City of Seattle, Washington |
Washington |
2020-03-17 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process first-in-time fourteenth-amendment landlord-tenant legislative-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings substantive-due-process takings tenant-selection undue-oppression |
Whether the destruction of a fundamental attribute of property ownership constitutes a taking without the need to prove diminished value or interferen… |
| 19-318 |
Francis A. Bottini, Jr., et al. v. City of San Diego, California, et al. |
California |
2019-09-09 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
due-process first-english first-english-precedent investment-backed-expectations penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings single-family-housing takings takings-clause temporary-takings |
Should the investment-backed-expectations test of Penn Central be construed to totally bar recovery whenever the purchaser of a single-family lot is u… |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient 'economic impact' to support a regulatory takin… |
| 18-8305 |
Nausheen Zainulabeddin v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-03-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
commerce-clause disability-discrimination diversity-jurisdiction due-process federal-preemption fourteenth-amendment property-rights regulatory-taking sovereign-immunity |
Did the lower court violate Commerce Clause of the constitution of Article 1, section 8, Clause 3; when it denied principal's interest to maintain uni… |
| 18-1101 |
Classic Cab, Inc. v. District of Columbia, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights dormant-commerce-clause emergency-rulemaking mootness preexisting-contracts regulatory-taking res-judicata statutory-requirement |
Is the use of illegal emergency rulemakings in the absence of any objectively cognizable emergency resulting in the complete elimination of an industr… |
| 18-1062 |
Love Terminal Partners, L.P., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-13 |
Denied |
Amici (8) |
civil-rights due-process economic-impact fair-market-value federal-law investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations just-compensation property-rights property-taking regulatory-environment regulatory-taking takings |
Whether courts may treat real property as worthless solely because the owner was not generating positive cash flow at the time of the taking |
| 18-394 |
Denis P. Kelleher, et ux. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
New York |
2018-09-27 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
discretionary-land-use-permit discretionary-permit investment-backed-expectations land-use-restriction palazzolo-v-rhode-island penn-central penn-central-test property-rights real-estate-market regulatory-taking regulatory-takings regulatory-takings-test |
Whether a property owner may be deemed to lack investment-backed expectations, and thus be barred from challenging a land use restriction as a regulat… |
| 18-324 |
Douglas Leone, et ux., as Trustees Under That Certain Unrecorded Leone-Perkins Family Trust Dated August 26, 1999, as Amended v. Maui County, Hawaii, et al. |
Hawaii |
2018-09-13 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment economic-benefit economically-beneficial-use fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment investment-use just-compensation land-use lucas-v-south-carolina-coastal-council natural-state property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause |
Whether holding undeveloped property as an 'investment' or using it as a 'park' in its natural state constitutes economically beneficial or productive… |