| 24A546 |
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-12-04 |
Presumed Complete |
|
final-decision land-use-restrictions lucas-claim property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine |
Whether a regulatory takings claim is ripe for judicial review when the government's land-use restrictions unambiguously preclude all economically ben… |
| 23-1277 |
PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham, New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process final-decision government-action land-development land-use permit-denial property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine takings |
Are two final denials of development applications sufficient to ripen a regulatory takings claim, where the government asserts that it might grant a t… |
| 23-7139 |
Eugenia Woodard v. Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation, et al. |
Texas |
2024-04-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law appeals civil-procedure due-process final-decision final-order jurisdiction jurisdictional-review procedural-error sovereign-immunity standing statutory-interpretation |
How does U.S. Supreme Court address final decision/order of lower courts when dates are in questioned? |
| 23-1045 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-03-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is… |
| 23-267 |
Marilyn Williams v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-09-20 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure final-decision interlocutory-ruling rule-41 rule-41(a) voluntary-dismissal |
Does an interlocutory ruling that dismisses some (but not all) of a plaintiff's claims with prejudice become an appealable 'final decision' if the pla… |
| 23A98 |
Matthew Haney v. Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts, et al. |
First Circuit |
2023-08-02 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment final-decision regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine variance-request zoning-board |
Whether a property owner's as-applied regulatory takings claim is ripe for federal court review when a local zoning board has not issued a final decis… |
| 21-1438 |
Tamia Banks, et al. v. Cotter Corporation, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-05-13 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-jurisdiction atomic-energy-act claim-severance federal-jurisdiction final-decision nuclear-incident price-anderson-act public-liability statutory-interpretation |
Whether there has been a 'nuclear incident' such that the Price Anderson Act is applicable and provides original jurisdiction when the Congressional c… |
| 21-1167 |
Terry Rene Chapman v. Social Security Administration, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-02-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
binding disability-rights federal-pleading-standards final-decision judicial-precedent legislation precedent pro-se-petition stare-decisis unbinding unpublished-opinion |
How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding without a Precedent for Stare Decisis? |
| 21-5459 |
Bernabe Encarnacion v. Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-08-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest double-jeopardy due-process final-decision jurisdiction pro-bono-counsel standing summary-judgment |
Whether the court has jurisdiction over the defendants, and whether the court of appeals order was a final decision and this petition was timely filed |
| 19-1252 |
Callan Campbell, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
final-decision government-action property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings statute-of-limitations takings tucker-act |
Does the Tucker Act's statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiffs … |
| 19-6925 |
Sulaiman Taalibdin v. Lawrence Mahally, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-12-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals-court appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure district-court due-process final-decision habeas-corpus motion-timeliness rule-60(b) rule-60b standing third-circuit |
Did the Circuit Court possess appellate jurisdiction when the district court ruled petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion untimely under Rule 60(b)(6) which w… |
| 19-199 |
Manfredo M. Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-08-15 |
Judgment Issued |
|
administrative-law agency-decision-making benefits-determination final-decision judicial-review railroad-retirement-act railroad-retirement-board railroad-unemployment-insurance-act statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Railroad Retirement Board's denial of a request to reopen a prior benefits determination is subject to judicial review |
| 18-8157 |
James Arthur Brinson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction final-decision fraud fraud-on-court judicial-procedure state-court timeliness untimeliness |
Is a constitutional right of access to the courts being denied when a fraud on a state court decision is used to prove untimeliness when federal court… |
| 18-6356 |
Earl Reyes v. Dale Artus |
Second Circuit |
2018-10-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure-appeal court-of-appeals federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure final-decision frap-rule-24 in-forma-pauperis indigent-appellant indigent-rights motion-to-vacate plain-error standing Whether the court of appeals abused its discretion Whether the court of appeals was correct to requir |
Whether it was plain error for a court of appeals to deny in forma pauperis relief to an indigent appellant |