Terry Rene Chapman v. Social Security Administration, et al.
ERISA DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding without a Precedent for Stare Decisis?
Question(s) Presented for Review: How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding without a Precedent for Stare Decisis? Will there be a Legislation of The Law not being upheld by Precedents or Stare Decisis -& If unbinding to a Final Decision, what abridged an unabridged matter of a precedent for what is held by Stare Decisis in a Legislated Law? * What Constitute a Constitutional Matter if not by Law: Ora . ; Public Interest: a State or Federal Statute or rules for or against : Bridging...? The federal notice pleading standards for addressing that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claims...which would entitle him to relief."... for constitutional tights. * Rule 35 only address the hearing or rehearing en banc, in the 7.22.21 decision, case no. JMC-20-636; why was there not a poll to address the rehearing as petitioned, rule 35.a.2? Never was there a hearing but informal briefs that was Petitioned for a rehearing & rehearing en banc that was denied 9.24.21, case no. 21-1022. * Contemporary vs. Popular vs. Ways of Caring. The Courts, The : People or Current Law ... The question here is Working with : Disabilities (ADA), than to be Wrongfully Terminated as a Disabled Veteran from federal service. My question is, does the form js44 : : for case 1:20cv00636jmc, 20-cv-00636-JKB establish a complaint; inwhich case no.21-1022 denied as having no reversible error(s)? * What is the uniform practice for Stare Decisis: Rule 35{a)(2) is of exceptional importance if the 4th circuit is to continue to use mere : . formalities to address issues from the lower courts on appeal in an abridge matter? ; * With the JS44 a conflict in this case; the request for Rehearing & Rehearing En Banc on the question for which the 4th circuit had 1 denied case no. 21-1022, on the 7.22.21 decision in case no. 20-cv00636-jkb, that involves one or more exceptional importance on the petition for Rehearing & Rehearing En banc as to the complaint that was filed vs. what was adjudicated; 9.24.21. * How is this issue final, if not binding? Is The Court's Opinion not binding in all this, as to the Fed. Notice Pleading Standard? * Note: Justia Case Law For unconstitutionality of nonprecedential Appellate Rulings, the legal intelligencers for contemporary findings or any findings for Binding Decisions in : today's Persuasive Values, for working with Disabilities or in the mind, for a binding opinion to be constitutional. The consistent, reasonably, with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. ; ..that say what about an unbinding decision, the rulings in case no. 20-00636-jkb that does not address the consistence for the js44 as having a complaint. On its merit rule 45(b) to find favor; & a sufficient Complaint rule 37(a). It is the doctrine Rule 10-101, ; Standardized Court Form: for procedural due process for the federal pleading standard. ; In all this, how can something nonbinding be anymore than cause the court say so Can the court see blind matters for the law; that nonbinding can't be a metaphor for empathy, for stare decisis shares light to the laws that adds life to precedent? * Is the Petitioner's case for review a Matter of Law; to make the lower courts do their Due Diligence's in the Original Complaint for Wrongful Termination? The Petitioner had a complaint the lower ; court struck down as not being a complaint, case 20-636-jkb. * The 4th Circuit Court of the U.S., affirmed by unpublished per curiam an opinion and stated, unpublished opinions are not binding : : 2 precedent in this circuit. My question to the Supreme Court: What circuit(s) has precedent for stare decisis in every decision? How : would an unbinding decision carry more weight than a Persuasive Argument; when a Persuasive Argument is an exception to the , General Rule, per Stare Decisis? Did the Appellate Court & the District Court for the District of Maryland rule correctly; when equal ; weight should had been given to VA Findings of 100