No. 21-1167

Terry Rene Chapman v. Social Security Administration, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: binding disability-rights federal-pleading-standards final-decision judicial-precedent legislation precedent pro-se-petition stare-decisis unbinding unpublished-opinion
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding without a Precedent for Stare Decisis?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Question(s) Presented for Review: How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding without a Precedent for Stare Decisis? Will there be a Legislation of The Law not being upheld by Precedents or Stare Decisis -& If unbinding to a Final Decision, what abridged an unabridged matter of a precedent for what is held by Stare Decisis in a Legislated Law? * What Constitute a Constitutional Matter if not by Law: Ora . ; Public Interest: a State or Federal Statute or rules for or against : Bridging...? The federal notice pleading standards for addressing that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claims...which would entitle him to relief."... for constitutional tights. * Rule 35 only address the hearing or rehearing en banc, in the 7.22.21 decision, case no. JMC-20-636; why was there not a poll to address the rehearing as petitioned, rule 35.a.2? Never was there a hearing but informal briefs that was Petitioned for a rehearing & rehearing en banc that was denied 9.24.21, case no. 21-1022. * Contemporary vs. Popular vs. Ways of Caring. The Courts, The : People or Current Law ... The question here is Working with : Disabilities (ADA), than to be Wrongfully Terminated as a Disabled Veteran from federal service. My question is, does the form js44 : : for case 1:20cv00636jmc, 20-cv-00636-JKB establish a complaint; inwhich case no.21-1022 denied as having no reversible error(s)? * What is the uniform practice for Stare Decisis: Rule 35{a)(2) is of exceptional importance if the 4th circuit is to continue to use mere : . formalities to address issues from the lower courts on appeal in an abridge matter? ; * With the JS44 a conflict in this case; the request for Rehearing & Rehearing En Banc on the question for which the 4th circuit had 1 denied case no. 21-1022, on the 7.22.21 decision in case no. 20-cv00636-jkb, that involves one or more exceptional importance on the petition for Rehearing & Rehearing En banc as to the complaint that was filed vs. what was adjudicated; 9.24.21. * How is this issue final, if not binding? Is The Court's Opinion not binding in all this, as to the Fed. Notice Pleading Standard? * Note: Justia Case Law For unconstitutionality of nonprecedential Appellate Rulings, the legal intelligencers for contemporary findings or any findings for Binding Decisions in : today's Persuasive Values, for working with Disabilities or in the mind, for a binding opinion to be constitutional. The consistent, reasonably, with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. ; ..that say what about an unbinding decision, the rulings in case no. 20-00636-jkb that does not address the consistence for the js44 as having a complaint. On its merit rule 45(b) to find favor; & a sufficient Complaint rule 37(a). It is the doctrine Rule 10-101, ; Standardized Court Form: for procedural due process for the federal pleading standard. ; In all this, how can something nonbinding be anymore than cause the court say so Can the court see blind matters for the law; that nonbinding can't be a metaphor for empathy, for stare decisis shares light to the laws that adds life to precedent? * Is the Petitioner's case for review a Matter of Law; to make the lower courts do their Due Diligence's in the Original Complaint for Wrongful Termination? The Petitioner had a complaint the lower ; court struck down as not being a complaint, case 20-636-jkb. * The 4th Circuit Court of the U.S., affirmed by unpublished per curiam an opinion and stated, unpublished opinions are not binding : : 2 precedent in this circuit. My question to the Supreme Court: What circuit(s) has precedent for stare decisis in every decision? How : would an unbinding decision carry more weight than a Persuasive Argument; when a Persuasive Argument is an exception to the , General Rule, per Stare Decisis? Did the Appellate Court & the District Court for the District of Maryland rule correctly; when equal ; weight should had been given to VA Findings of 100

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Social Security Administration, et al. to respond filed.
2022-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)
2021-11-09
Application (21A121) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 21, 2022.
2021-10-26
Application (21A121) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 23, 2021 to February 21, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Social Security Administration, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Terry R. Chapman
Terry R. Chapman — Petitioner
Terry R. Chapman — Petitioner