No. 19-6925
Sulaiman Taalibdin v. Lawrence Mahally, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals-court appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure district-court due-process final-decision habeas-corpus motion-timeliness rule-60(b) rule-60b standing third-circuit
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Circuit Court possess appellate jurisdiction when the district court ruled petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion untimely under Rule 60(b)(6) which was not before the court and failed to issue a final decision on petitioner's claim under Rule 60(b)(4)?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Pursuant to U.S.C.S. § 1291 did the Circuit Court possess appellate jurisdiction when the: district court ruled petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion untimely under Rule 60(b)(6) which was not before the court and failed to issue a final decision on ‘petitioner's claim under Rule 60(b)(4)? (i)
Docket Entries
2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-12-18
Waiver of right of respondent Lawrence Mahally, Supt., Dallas, et al. to respond filed.
2019-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Lawrence Mahally, Supt., Dallas, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent