| 25-1137 |
Nicholas Honchariw, Trustee, Honchariw Family Trust v. County of Stanislaus, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-03-30 |
Pending |
Response Waived |
land-use property-rights regulatory-taking takings-clause vested-rights vesting-tentative-map |
Whether an approved vesting tentative map which conferred a statutory vested right to finalize a subdivision upon substantial compliance with the cond… |
| 25-464 |
Philip G. Potter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-10-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split constitutional-rights due-process land-use section-1983 takings-claims |
Whether the accrual rule for takings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 applies to procedural due process claims asserted in land-use disputes. |
| 25A130 |
Philip G. Potter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-07-31 |
Presumed Complete |
|
certificate-of-occupancy federalism land-use procedural-due-process section-1983 statute-of-limitations |
1. Just two Terms ago, this Court held that the statute of limitations for a procedural due process claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 begins to run "only wh… |
| 24-815 |
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al. v. Indiana |
Indiana |
2025-01-31 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-law eminent-domain government-taking just-compensation land-use property-rights |
When the government undisputedly takes a real property right, is a landowner entitled to just compensation from the imposition of a project as a whole… |
| 23-1277 |
PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham, New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process final-decision government-action land-development land-use permit-denial property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine takings |
Are two final denials of development applications sufficient to ripen a regulatory takings claim, where the government asserts that it might grant a t… |
| 23-7432 |
Torrieo Monte Johnson, aka Torrieo Corker v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-05-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights corporate-fraud criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge land-use multi-defendant-case ninth-circuit-interpretation state-jurisdiction |
What is the Acceptance and Recordation Date For which the Federal Government Accepted Concurrent Legislative Jurisdiction From the STATE OF Georgia ov… |
| 23-1153 |
Cesar Romero, et al. v. Li-Chuan Shih, et al. |
California |
2024-04-23 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain land-use private-property property-rights takings takings-clause |
1. Whether a court order that excludes landowners from their real property and allows other private parties to permanently physically invade and occup… |
| 23-1045 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-03-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is… |
| 23A524 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-12-11 |
Presumed Complete |
|
as-applied-claim fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment land-use regulatory-takings ripeness |
Question not identified. |
| 23A364 |
BP America Production Company, et al. v. Parish of Cameron, Louisiana, et al. |
Louisiana |
2023-10-24 |
Denied |
|
coastal-erosion environmental-liability federal-preemption land-use oil-and-gas state-law |
Question not identified. |
| 23-5800 |
Malcolm Muhammad v. William E. Jackson, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-10-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
42-usc-1983 circuit-court civil-rights federal-law free-speech judicial-interpretation land-use property-rights religious-land-use-and-institutionalized-persons-a standing statutory-construction summary-judgment |
AppelWi-V aliened "tW-p deknciarvW 3ocVisor\3bft€S and. Tu.rf\ff dea^ed hirv^ op-Ids
ti c^VvVs ar»<Ur -VU AtvervArKfv^ o/d fteldyoa-^ La^-d vise ar>d… |
| 22-442 |
Tatana Spicakova Romero, et vir v. Li-Chuan Shih, et al. |
California |
2022-11-10 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment 5th-amendment due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment land-use private-property property-rights takings |
1. Whether a court order that excludes land owners from their real property and allows other private parties to physically invade and occupy the owner… |
| 21-7864 |
Andrew James Johnston v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-05-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
fifth-amendment land-use permit property-rights public-easement takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-7810 |
Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process fifth-amendment land-use property-rights regulatory-takings takings-clause |
SHOULD THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BE ABLE TO OVERRULE THE NINETH CIRCUIT'S RULING STATING: ("DEPRIVATIONS OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS DO NOT TRIGGER STRICT SCRUT… |
| 21-7098 |
Thomas G. Landreth v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-02-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights indian-law land-use navigable-waters property-rights redress-of-grievances sovereign-immunity treaty-interpretation treaty-rights tribal-sovereignty |
1. Whether 25 U.S.C. @ 1302 preserves the sovereign immunity claimed by the Quinault Indian Tribe/Nation when citizens have or seek redress for grieva… |
| 21-986 |
Donald A. Vanderveer v. Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of East Hampton, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2022-01-13 |
Denied |
|
administrative-hearing administrative-law cross-examination due-process land-use liberty-interest property-rights zoning-board |
Since 1947, Petitioner Vanderveer's Family has owned 3+ acres of land (with a small barn) in the Town of East Hampton, New York. Petitioner asserts he… |
| 21-766 |
Douglass Properties II, LLC v. City of Olympia, Washington |
Washington |
2021-11-23 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-scrutiny due-process government-discretion impact-fees koontz-v-st-johns land-use land-use-permit nollan-dolan-doctrine nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-rights takings |
Whether, after Koontz, the Nollan/Dolan doctrine applies generally to impact fees, i.e., whether after Koontz there is any distinction between "adjudi… |
| 21-112 |
Juliet Erickson, et al. v. Nevada County, California |
California |
2021-07-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights deed-restriction due-process exaction land-use municipal-ordinance permit-denial property-rights takings |
Does an exaction occur when a County, in violation of its own ordinances, refuse s to issue a building permit it previously approved for a single-fami… |
| 21-5130 |
Michael Storey v. City of Alton, Illinois |
Illinois |
2021-07-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure development-regulation due-process land-use municipal-law property-rights takings zoning |
Can a city deny a resident use of his land without due process?
Can city allow resident to develop his property then without any changes to its Offic… |
| 20-1551 |
Arthur O. Armstrong v. North Carolina, et al. |
North Carolina |
2021-05-10 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights conspiracy due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment land-encroachment land-use property-rights takings |
1. Whether respondents transgressed the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the
Constitution of the United States when appellees on or about December … |
| 20-1286 |
Sacramento County, California v. Joseph Hardesty, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-16 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
chosen-profession due-process executive-action executive-decisions land-use land-use-regulation legislative-decisions municipal-decision-making occupational-liberty substantive-due-process zoning-ordinance |
This case presents two questions involving efforts to expand the scope of the substantive component of the Due Process Clause.
1. Land-use regulation… |
| 20-821 |
Mountainlands Conservancy, LLC, et al. v. California Coastal Commission, et al. |
California |
2020-12-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
coastal-regulation due-process fourteenth-amendment land-use procedural-due-process property-rights substantive-due-process takings zoning zoning-law |
1. When the California Coastal Commission's certification of the County of Los Angeles' local coastal program imposed a complete ban on the establishm… |
| 19-7031 |
Allen James Hancock v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-12-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
5th-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure due-process equal-protection land-use property-rights regulatory-takings standing statutory-interpretation takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 19-502 |
Richard Baatz, et al. v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-10-18 |
Denied |
|
certificate-of-public-convenience due-process eminent-domain federal-energy-regulatory-commission land-use natural-gas-act property-rights regulatory-authority takings |
Whether the Natural Gas Act requires the holder of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to obtain by easement, contract, or eminent domai… |
| 18-1538 |
Dartmond Cherk, et al. v. Marin County, California |
California |
2019-06-13 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedRelisted (4) |
development-exactions development-fees dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process essential-nexus koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use legislative-exactions nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights rough-proportionality takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
1. Whether permit conditions are exempt from review under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine when their intended purpose is not to mitigate adve… |
| 18A1211 |
Karolyn Givens, et al. v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-22 |
Presumed Complete |
|
condemnation eminent-domain fourth-circuit land-use pipeline-easement property-rights |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8697 |
Frederick H. Banks v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC, fka Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLC |
Pennsylvania |
2019-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure document-submission due-process electronic-filing fifth-amendment immigration institutional-barriers judicial-access land-use pacer prisoner-litigation privacy privacy-policy property-rights regulatory-takings social-security takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-874 |
Houston Auto M. Imports Greenway, Limited, dba Mercedes-Benz of Houston Greenway v. Mark Zastrow, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5th-amendment certificate-of-compliance declaration-under-penalty-of-perjury due-process eminent-domain land-use property-rights supreme-court-rule-33.1(d) supreme-court-rule-33.1(h) takings word-count |
Question not identified. |
| 18-535 |
Residents Against Flooding, et al. v. Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen, City of Houston, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-10-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split civil-procedure land-use land-use-decisions motion-to-dismiss property-rights rational-basis rule-12b6 standard-of-review substantive-due-process takings |
1. Whether, and to what extent, on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a court must give deference to a plaintiff's complaint, viewing the government's… |
| 18-324 |
Douglas Leone, et ux., as Trustees Under That Certain Unrecorded Leone-Perkins Family Trust Dated August 26, 1999, as Amended v. Maui County, Hawaii, et al. |
Hawaii |
2018-09-13 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment economic-benefit economically-beneficial-use fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment investment-use just-compensation land-use lucas-v-south-carolina-coastal-council natural-state property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause |
Whether holding undeveloped property as an "investment" or using it as a "park" in its natural state constitutes economically beneficial or productive… |
| 18-54 |
William A. Dabbs, Jr. v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland |
Maryland |
2018-07-10 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
development-exaction dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use land-use-development land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking monetary-exaction nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether legislatively proscribed monetary exactions on land use development are subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional conditions doctrine as … |