Malcolm Muhammad v. William E. Jackson, et al.
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in deferring to the district court's findings that the appellant failed to present evidence disputing the defendants' testimony that they were not responsible for denying prayer services and a feast meal for the celebration of the Nation of Islam (NOI) holiday at 'Saviors' Day' in 2018 and 2019"
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Appellont alleged thot defen dants eckson, Jones and Turner deared him of his vights under He Firs} Arendt ans Religicas Land Use and Lastihticnelized Person Nck(“RW PA“) Cor thar (oilure fo provide him preyer service anda feast maot forthe ele brodion of the Nokion of Islan -C*Hoi") holidayot “saviors Oey “in 2018 ond 2ard, la finding no wversible evr, the FoarYh Great relied upon the Distiot Cure Order granting Sumanery jedgrent fo defeadants ard cis missing he pellarts 42 usc. £1963 achtn . he Guts Comple let tgrere beth motler of moter) Lecls and law when ih concluded , Did He Fourth Creat erc tn defecring de He disheck Courts Crdngs ob Appevart hos nok put forfn any evidence thot dispues , Cortrediots deferdont Je Ksans Swerry fesbimeny Yhof he Uses rok yesemsible Ser “Orapn vewy any Sevors Doy Progeny Oubside of entering noms inte He Master Pass list, and delendont Jeness testimony alleshing thot he does po} Krow why te heli dou was rot Seb veo"