No. 21-7810

Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-09
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: due-process fifth-amendment land-use property-rights regulatory-takings takings-clause
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from requiring a property owner to dedicate a public easement as a condition of obtaining a permit to develop private property

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QGUESH LVS PRESEN FO I. SHOWUWO File (fF 7!e% Cf1#COD Bf bli Fe QLLECL Fite PIN EZ CftCCf7I (CULE SPAIN: 0" EVVN LAUDS Cf Fftl7 COUN OK EN 7 LOl¢ET . 00 Wee AVE! 76° Hh Fite SA flea VIDS, AS Ob flO bz hTS af. Za Jef! 7 her SN ON? FM EAES ASHE ON bl Fe kL EL WELL Y ASME FMT BN (ERS Cab, MUNI Hl felipe CAPE ce COitt 4, Sk \GL CT GAH US W742 Lie AG. 2 SHILO Pet Whit ll (NIGP ULE Bi GCC OWA %o hu 2 pith G7 Fe fk fl BG 30 Se VAIN /75 bhthN [760 CLABR FS FES? 5 INGE ently Wilt NEF GME FO Aft) HE Z WENO (7 bb rele ° 3 SGA D Feat Diggs SMUT OS SKIT Oe BUND 7° ONY UO fb IAD Ce C4EJ ¢JECS PEKLLOEE, Weld GRANTING (7 Fe AO STHLS ? 5 , . SHKLO YEW OMG 6 AOS iy, LBM Se WHO Wit pbO seh, glleby NN — MLVIS 76 fl) Ait LK SEVIS SAL CLS BNO WA IK) Wb fO5¢tbC" KP CHEN alto THAN fe -Che PI MEO PRA MIOYoO Be tC Yay LEXMMUIE 76 00 zert Saat? 5S. sSuath Zi STLUG Of EKG! LETUOT ASWINWEZ Pint A bP AE fab ISAT ltr POLAR CLC OE CRP USL (SLE sth Subttrap cous COM W O USCASE ys-conr7 oh Er Celez Alek OBE Meds ra ui eg FE He EEE AE V6. {7-2 W/. AWD sro? AM (Pf E/6 OAD Fe Le KbLE A fOECGVO2 0/G/07S 18 6 OAM IING pif Ale SOMES fob Cl§ (OS CEUBLL Za TL AWD LEESON, | G UW 17 MAES % kézgiang 2 f be W168 {hg Nit LAD Fete LAIIONS FE ZZ: tl ~it{Nb Lo Ate AMOS Pt EC [6/003 SHUCS (260 Fee 1OASLWOENTZS ? 72 OWkl Hie (WI TAN (0) KEES SIGE Z EK MOV bby gro Glob AI O77 Fe COULSON GILLING fUZCHWVS FO 60 CCK ANNO Zh KES CHC aS CMOPRB ATS CHE Alt bo boy M6 PAU AL LECOLIAS Fie S7tGE Mtl? (78 SPH Li fl Cll 7 MO SL COTE go COVLE: Of0 (A FAA A lolprettdt jeu tls pyle a” POLI NE ak phitts wi FB LC Here ¥ PP cpg ephlfbe,, COLT, PEEIEr SOS, bNO LESGEDS ZA Cee” oe , pat Wl FE COE ZL | ) LISA Of? (bh S Lo COtéWea ClhE5 META (STB Af HGS) fL0. IL f2S-YE BUSI, FH KOS FEC 2. KAS ao Y GAtNWhtil (S70 A ZED KEN JB KFSS * Til AEP PWISTFOTE IS YO COLC/NS Ove PU Bly , CUM OE BYE (307) 665-5553 . ¢. C40b¢0 B07 titty lilhtl GOSTAY | [(3°0 fophhlV 02, SHE BLIY OCSFOt, FRA OS V7OGG . C23) 777 -200¢ SCrebplp CLBVIT Ch it litt ChZdb a7 [3926 FMM b/d acest, ZESGS TIDE CY) 777-20 AZ RECEDED ClNES SOM COR FZ SP 29LL7 POS TIC (GU fi CPL £4 263730 SKIING fa {EFM GAYE 20YOfEl DENIM CE MEL Goes AKAAOE TAS? — ZlY°VES REC $/OLE EKA , 2/-Z°6OF = CLbEy LELOTF TZ. TOM OF2 CLL GEIFT. 4A IG Ht! 76S SOU WE: QRS Pek it Le Putin /2CE ~-D9ZSGCL 1 * 8 Free fi evtise, Cheb _ fO CoM Le Welhirfe2, SVS OS FEF (2) : ST fartpergf4 Bo firtg Mtg Le J fe9 otf fyekeLrons ~ . ; ‘ Sechico vs Gelarr, YOO Zo, 2l SEP (ZK6 Cr. » ‘TS EAI? OE /96E), Secbeall v Philpl, 20 Fd 167 (PAP 199 Y). fe: oh Lone nigh get" v ate Mer (77-3 Arc Lens: TE PHUE AE COV ZENS CYMIENVS . ; . . toe / SUMS HL ; A Sz coer Zemin eye Gb rar L000 LS LO” STAUNUN 7 OK Ke CaAH . Loo Ch hss fo GLEN TIS Fle VWF CON LOS AV ALUM OM Wi 0S Kl CLEE COAT YE ALVUAS AILEY BS! f si Kbs (AOE Clitieebe ¢ AAA Ve coq MS FA7, SIME KH BA. [ aa ge wv CHE | PLT Poa [ftei7, of” COLTER! fate, fener TCL a Vidi fhel a cork af cerllerar (SSO fo StHWCC’L 4hc peel Lifes OSUNMIONLS fF CMS ee St, Gest: To cpiner of fhe Crifel Stele (ofbk, Cae See focdnte ev Ae ACA Gace 5 pyavetecd (a fur fafhect/ (Gur -Y¥7 fic “4 ie enperetionr See L;(44 Creel Can (Ve [PLOW D Few comyeeey on A fry Leleof, /ihe (te . Ly Grey MeeiLe Aer 24 a ae Oke, PR e “a hyp fron Colp?LreLens 4 prt. | hom, | d. SUYSSIN CTIULY ee Lecled/! (erh, | CGreeL Secde! any Ce febreary 2 LEZ. 4 fone [of perkins nel /¢C butey Z eee’ hy persdiclees Is feud ts ap vee! onde 26 USC Ste. (E590), See Aupala A i . 2: CONSUTOWN BN S70 TUTE PROUD BRS, (UL AD 0° LOO7 Wid titi7 jones Aube Cle CASE fe Mrs ret M607 vo paeanihe ork LCG/IG ° LO LIAB ME YA NT (till fbb Uli 7s Fal GO LUNI -Lu0O PN (oid Gs yoe Fo BAULCMWY AF LOI Lbt ffl Che bh LLUVG/OEL, Ze fa AMMA Iu AUN E hao FG GF oe filly? Lad post lyVs, of FATE fil (BS LbUbLSE GP SPY LLLUION... * we £OUL flo LGCIE Of Wipe PRA TAA VLA Len hE ee SAGHEGMI BNO WWIOLOLLMTAAY: Vit pinMl yt hyt 7 Ck OdbEY LE SPU CeN0SUGNWYS fbb 7[M6 Fett fll HO CA RLS OL 3. STHUIMYUNWP

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner