| 25-776 |
Youth 71Five Ministries v. Charlene Williams, Individually and as Director of Oregon Department of Education, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-01-02 |
Pending |
Response RequestedResponse Waived |
constitutional-rights employment-discrimination first-amendment government-action grant-funding religious-autonomy |
For years, Petitioner Youth 71Five Ministries received grant funds from Oregon's Youth Community Investment Grants program. One year, 71Five even had … |
| 25-6348 |
Mounir Mrabet v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2025-12-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
consent fourth-amendment government-action probable-cause search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
Can 4L. G&vermen4 <^o iw+o mu ZCclo^J Accent
om4 m j consent -4han ase -iKd' cxaatnst m
v^^rr^n |
| 25-284 |
Leila Green Little, et al. v. Llano County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-09-11 |
Denied |
Amici (7) |
book-censorship first-amendment free-speech government-action library-access viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether book-removal decisions by government officials in a county library are subject to scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment |
| 25A228 |
United States v. Darby Development Company, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2025-08-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-agency fifth-amendment government-action regulatory-taking statutory-authority takings-clause |
Whether an administrative agency's unauthorized regulatory action that exceeds its statutory authority can constitute a compensable taking under the F… |
| 24-1236 |
Louis Farrakhan, et al. v. Anti-Defamation League, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-06-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-USC-1983 article-III-standing first-amendment government-action quasi-governmental-actor representational-standing |
Whether the Second Circuit erred in its interpretation of representational standing under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and First Amendment protections against qua… |
| 24-1095 |
Chelsea Koetter v. Manistee County Treasurer, et al. |
Michigan |
2025-04-21 |
Rehearing |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
constitutional-law due-process government-action just-compensation property-rights takings-clause |
Does the government violate the Due Process or Takings Clause by denying just compensation to property owners who miss a narrow and premature window t… |
| 24-844 |
Joseph Srour v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-02-07 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-challenge facial-unconstitutionality government-action judicial-review mootness vacatur |
Whether vacatur is proper where the government's voluntary conduct causes the case to become moot in the context of the review of a successful facial … |
| 24-755 |
Mollie Slaybaugh, et vir v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation police-power property-rights takings-clause |
Does a common law privilege to access property categorically absolve the government's duty of just compensation for property it physically destroys? |
| 24-291 |
Apache Stronghold v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-09-13 |
Denied |
Amici (15)Relisted (18) |
free-exercise-clause government-action native-american-rights religious-exercise religious-freedom-restoration-act sacred-site |
Whether the government 'substantially burdens' religious exercise under RFRA, or must satisfy heightened scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause, when… |
| 23-1363 |
Vicki Baker v. City of McKinney, Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-07-02 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (4) |
constitutional-law eminent-domain government-action just-compensation police-power property-rights public-use takings-clause |
Whether the Takings Clause applies when the government takes property for a compelling public use pursuant to its police power |
| 23-1277 |
PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham, New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process final-decision government-action land-development land-use permit-denial property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine takings |
Are two final denials of development applications sufficient to ripen a regulatory takings claim, where the government asserts that it might grant a t… |
| 23A1080 |
Larry R. Steele v. United States Postal Service, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-06-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-liberties constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment freedom-of-expression government-action |
Whether the First Amendment protects an individual's right to challenge government actions that allegedly infringe upon fundamental freedoms of expres… |
| 23-7201 |
Wayne Phillip Vance v. Glen Engstrom, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights community-welfare compensation due-process government-action individual-rights liberty property standing takings |
Does the U.S. government have the right to place citizens and other people in hellish circumstances or conditions without regard for their wealth, saf… |
| 23A753 |
United States v. Ideker Farms, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-02-15 |
Presumed Complete |
|
endangered-species fifth-amendment flood-control government-action missouri-river takings-clause |
Whether the government's implementation of flood control and environmental protection measures constitutes a compensable taking under the Fifth Amendm… |
| 23-626 |
Elon Musk v. Securities and Exchange Commission |
Second Circuit |
2023-12-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-action sec-enforcement settlement settlement-agreement standing unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether a party's acceptance of a benefit prevents that party from contending that the government violated the unconstitutional conditions doctrine in… |
| 23-169 |
CraneVeyor Corp. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-08-22 |
Denied |
|
due-process economic-impact government-action investment-backed-expectations lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central property-rights regulatory-takings takings zoning-regulation |
Should this Court overrule or reconsider Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York? |
| 23-5106 |
John B. Freitas v. Superior Court of California, Alameda County, et al. |
California |
2023-07-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-protection due-process equity equity-theft fifth-amendment government-action homeowner-rights just-compensation property-rights takings-clause |
Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation when the government improperly denies a homeowner the ability to use thei… |
| 23-5033 |
Rick John Morales, Jr. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-diligence expert-witness government-action speedy-trial trial-procedure trial-scheduling witness-appearance |
Whether sending an email asking if there is a 'better' date for an expert witness qualifies as the Government's requirement to act with 'due diligence… |
| 22-1224 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Is a takings claim ripe when the government establishes a mandatory process requiring property owners to ask whether any development on their land is … |
| 22-7581 |
Michael D. Beiter, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-05-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-records chilling-effect court-precedent due-process government-action grand-jury legal-relief legal-rights penalization procedural-limitation prosecutorial-misconduct selective-prosecution |
Whether a person is precluded from doing what the law plainly allows them to do, as the government pursues a course of action to penalize a person's r… |
| 22-1100 |
Palani Karupaiyan v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-05-10 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-action property-rights section-1982 standing takings writ-of-mandamus |
Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to address the national importance of the issues raised, the conflict with prior Supreme Court rulin… |
| 22-7390 |
Robert James Turner, aka Robert James Branham v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-04-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
assimilative-crimes-act civil-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process federal-jurisdiction government-action jurisdictional-dispute legal-review ninth-circuit stipulation |
Whether the district court's jurisdiction over the case was legally defeated by the defendant's stipulation regarding the location of the offense, and… |
| 22-843 |
J. P. Bryan, et al. v. Eleazar R. Cano, County Judge |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-03-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-injury due-process government-action judicial-review public-health public-health-emergency rational-basis-test standing takings |
Is the rational-basis-test used to ratify COVID-19-orders closing a hotel overly-deferential? |
| 22-6567 |
Pedro Benitez v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2023-01-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law administrative-procedure-act civil-procedure government-action judicial-review standing |
What is the proper standard for determining whether a petitioner has standing to challenge a government action under the Administrative Procedure Act? |
| 22-650 |
Orlando Bar Group, LLC, et al. v. Ron DeSantis, Governor of Florida, et al. |
Florida |
2023-01-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation property-rights public-nuisance state-of-emergency takings |
During a state of emergency, are there constitutional safeguards that prohibit the government from denying property owners substantially all economica… |
| 22-6523 |
Alfonzo Johnlouis v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
fourth-amendment government-action government-actor mail-carrier postal-service search-and-seizure standing unreasonable-search unreasonable-searches warrantless-search |
Is the warrantless search of a First Class sealed mail Priority package by a United States Postal Service mail carrier during the course and scope of … |
| 22-609 |
Carsten Igor Rosenow, aka Carlos Senta v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-01-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split electronic-communication electronic-communications fourth-amendment government-action privacy private-search search-and-seizure statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Ninth Circuit's rigid multi-pronged test for determining government action in relation to electronic communication service providers compo… |
| 22-6367 |
Randall Bernard Allen v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-12-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-action individual-rights rule-of-law standing takings |
Where government, state and city administrations are regulators, can The Rule of Law, and U.S.Constitutional rights be abandoned for those administrat… |
| 22-493 |
Erica Bojicic, dba Evolve Dance Company, LLC, et al. v. Richard Michael DeWine, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-11-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-law due-process emergency-powers eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action necessity police-power property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
Is the government required to prove with evidence that its action taken during an emergency which intrudes on private property rights was a necessity … |
| 22-5721 |
Sealed Appellant v. United States |
First Circuit |
2022-10-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-4245 constitutional-rights due-process government-action involuntary-transfer liberty-interest mental-health mental-health-detention statutory-procedure vitek-v-jones |
Whether the government violated petitioner's constitutional due process rights by involuntarily transferring him to, and holding him in, a secure ment… |
| 22-253 |
Christine Chui v. Benjamin Tze-Man Chui, et al. |
California |
2022-09-19 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing government-action guardianship judicial-procedure property-rights settlement settlement-binding |
Whether government can deprive real properties from parties without due process |
| 22-97 |
Owl Creek Asia I, L.P., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-08-02 |
Denied |
|
collins-v-yellen conservatorship corporate-ownership federal-claims federal-housing-finance-agency government-action net-worth-sweep private-shareholders property-interest shareholders-rights takings takings-clause |
Whether private shareholders have a direct, personal interest in challenging a taking of their rights incident to share ownership |
| 22-5097 |
Hidey Diaz, aka Silvio Manuel Amador, aka Celio Alvarez-Carrasco v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-07-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
10th-circuit circuit-court-review criminal-sentencing federal-prosecution government-action guideline-range sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines statutory-directive substantive-reasonableness unwarranted-disparity |
Did the Tenth Circuit err in concluding that it was barred from considering, on review for the substantive reasonableness of Mr. Diaz's sentence, the … |
| 21-8202 |
Eric Watkins v. Officer Shields, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-06-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights digital-search due-process fourth-amendment government-action probable-cause property-rights search-and-seizure takings territorial-jurisdiction warrant-authority |
Whether the government's seizure of a person's property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment |
| 21-1532 |
Brian Davison v. Deborah Rose, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-06-07 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-scrutiny due-process first-amendment free-speech government-action government-speech public-forum speech-restriction standing viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether a forum and scrutiny analysis are required when considering First Amendment infringement claims involving the government barring citizen speec… |
| 21-1511 |
Joy Garner, Individually and on Behalf of The Control Group, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-06-02 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights control-group due-process fifth-amendment government-action mandatory-vaccination scientific-evidence scientific-method standing standing-doctrine vaccine-mandate |
Do the threatened members of the Control Group have standing to sue the President for systematically destroying their evidence and violating the panop… |
| 21-7747 |
Michael G. Peters v. Kenneth M. Hoyt, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-04-28 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
citizen-rights civil-rights constitutional-violation corporate-cover-up due-process evidence-suppression free-speech government-action legal-dispute petition-clause standing takings |
Whether the First Amendment protects the right of citizens to petition the government for a redress of grievances, including the right to file lawsuit… |
| 21-933 |
Vdare Foundation v. City of Colorado Springs, Colorado |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-12-23 |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1983 civil-rights first-amendment free-speech government-action hate-speech municipal-services retaliation retaliation-claim section-1983 |
Whether a complaint based on a local government's public announcement that the plaintiff's speech may be illegal 'hate speech' and that, therefore, th… |
| 21-6626 |
Ronald Dean Ehinger v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2021-12-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process free-speech government-action standing takings |
Whether the Petitioners' First Amendment rights were violated by the government's actions |
| 21-854 |
Rachel Maniscalco, et al. v. New York City Department of Education, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-12-09 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights covid-19-mandate due-process employment employment-rights executive-order government-action professional-restriction public-health public-sector substantive-due-process vaccination |
Does the Executive Order violate the substantive due process rights of New York City public-school teachers whose sole employer is the DOE by preventi… |
| 21-6302 |
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2021-11-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech government-action immigration language-access public-officials retaliation |
How long Person From Guatemala Central America Denied Motion to withdraw Guilty Plea and Vacated the Sentenced |
| 21-148 |
California Restaurant Association, Inc. v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
2021-08-03 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
constitutional-law due-process government-action jacobson-v-massachusetts property-rights public-health rational-basis takings takings-clause |
Is due process satisfied, consistent with the decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), where a public health department acts based o… |
| 20-1751 |
Susan Fischer, et al. v. Phil Murphy, Governor of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2021-06-16 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights employee-rights first-amendment government-action public-employee standing union-dues union-speech waiver waiver-doctrine |
Whether governments and unions need clear and compelling evidence of a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of First Amendment rights to seize p… |
| 20-7684 |
Richard S. Glenn, Jr. v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-04-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-jurisdiction government-action judicial-review legal-precedent standing |
Whether the court applied the wrong standard of proof for a member of the public to establish standing to challenge a government action |
| 20-7593 |
Fernando Clarke v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2021-03-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2252 child-pornography criminal-law file-sharing government-action peer-to-peer peer-to-peer-network statutory-interpretation transportation-statute |
Whether the government's own action in uploading a file containing child pornography from the defendant's folder on a peer-to-peer network to the gove… |
| 20-7335 |
Raymond E. Carr v. Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff, Harris County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-03-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process free-speech government-action habeas-corpus retaliation standing |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the Texas state government retaliated against him for exercising his First Amendment… |
| 20-1203 |
Moose Jooce, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2021-03-03 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
administrative-procedure-act agency agency-law appointments-clause due-process government-action ratification ratification-doctrine rulemaking-authority standing |
Whether a government official has the power to validate the unauthorized actions of other officials is presumptively determined by the law of agency, … |
| 20-889 |
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Delaware County, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2021-01-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-standing chilled-speech civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech government-action standing |
Whether the Third Circuit violated clearly established precedent, in conflict with other Circuits, in denying Article III standing by considering the … |
| 20-806 |
Mary Swartzlander v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-12-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accrual erosion flooding flooding-event government-action government-taking land-erosion limitations-period property-rights statute-of-limitations takings |
When does a taking claim accrue against the government based on erosion caused by government action, where the erosion for many years was present only… |
| 20-768 |
Gerardo Serrano v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-12-04 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
appropriate-case civil-forfeiture due-process federal-law government-action legal-detention post-seizure-hearing split-in-circuits vehicle-seizure |
Does due process require a prompt post-seizure hearing for civil forfeiture? |
| 20-5823 |
Michael R. Spengler v. Los Angeles County District Attorney |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights collateral-estoppel constitutional-rights contempt-trial double-jeopardy due-process government-action habeas-corpus judicial-procedure pretrial-proceedings |
Whether a pretrial petitioner may challenge his custody as in violation of the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties, and whether this pretrial saf… |
| 19-1252 |
Callan Campbell, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
final-decision government-action property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings statute-of-limitations takings tucker-act |
Does the Tucker Act's statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiffs … |
| 19-986 |
Mary Lou Vosburgh, et al. v. Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2020-02-06 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process government-action liberty-interest mandamus name-clearing procedural-rights reputation reputation-harm |
When a government actor deprives an individual of his liberty interest in his reputation, is a state court proceeding in the nature of mandamus to com… |
| 19-948 |
Gene Rechtzigel v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2020-01-29 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment fifth-amendment first-amendment fourth-amendment government-action petition-clause sixth-amendment standing |
Did the Government deprive Petitioner the First Amendment Right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? |
| 19-6930 |
Richard Knider Jackson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights disability due-process government-action rehabilitation-act standing transcript |
Whether the government's denial of a disability accommodation violates the Rehabilitation Act and the Due Process Clause |
| 19-6786 |
Carol Johnene Morris v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-11-27 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process government-action habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review property sentencing standing takings |
Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should grant certiorari to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's decision affirming the district cou… |
| 19-6654 |
Tremaine Bernard Johnson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-11-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-provisions criminal-extradition due-process federal-authority federalism government-action interstate-jurisdiction jurisdiction jurisdictional-dispute legal-procedure reasons-for-granting-writ state-authority statement-of-case statutory-provisions uniform-criminal-extradition-act uniform-law |
Where does federal authority end and state authority begin when the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act is violated? |
| 19-383 |
Joseph Raimondo v. Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-09-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech government-action political-affiliation political-discrimination taxation |
Can the United States Federal Government single out citizens and demand taxation and then deprive the citizens of Constitutional Equal Protections bec… |
| 19-258 |
Richard Lewis Katzin, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-08-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5th-amendment deed-dispute due-process fifth-amendment government-action government-taking just-compensation land-ownership property-rights remand takings takings-clause title-claim unsalable-property |
Whether the Government can claim title to privately owned land and actively work to make that property unsaleable, without triggering the Fifth Amendm… |
| 18-9814 |
Robert Wazney v. Sharon Wazney |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-06-26 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process government-action jurisdiction standing takings |
Has the government's action violated the petitioner's constitutional rights? |
| 18A1328 |
Richard Lewis Katzin, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-06-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation land-ownership property-rights taking |
Whether the Government's unfounded assertions of title to private land that render it unsaleable and valueless constitute a taking of property without… |
| 18-1502 |
Brian Mark Burmaster v. Eli Lilly and Company |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-06-03 |
Denied |
|
6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights drug-marketing due-process free-speech government-action government-intervention government-overreach government-regulation medical-ethics pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-liability pharmaceutical-litigation sixth-amendment |
If a company's manufactured and marketed product is cited by the US Government as a 'miracle drug' to restore a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment r… |
| 18-1417 |
Yankton County, South Dakota v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-05-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accrual-suspension accrual-suspension-rule fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-taking government-action gradual-physical-process inverse-condemnation property-rights stabilization-doctrine takings takings-clause united-states-v-dickinson |
When a taking arises from a gradual physical process, may the claimant postpone filing suit until the situation stabilizes? |
| 18-1373 |
Gene Rechtzigel v. City of Apple Valley, Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2019-05-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eminent-domain government-action liberty property property-rights standing takings trial-by-jury |
Did the Government deprive Petitioner of Liberty, without Due Process of Law? |
| 18-1112 |
Alvin S. Kanofsky v. Bethlehem Area School District |
Pennsylvania |
2019-02-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-v bill-of-rights civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection freedom-of-speech government-action religion religious-discrimination takings taxation taxation-dispute |
Was Kanofsky denied Due Process, as required in Article V of the Bill of Rights? |
| 18-7592 |
Zane Hubbard v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law court-procedure due-process fair-procedure government-action judicial-review legal-interpretation standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the government's denial of Petitioner's request for a letter of recommendation violates the Constitution by denying the Petitioner's right to … |
| 18-963 |
Terrence Hill v. City of Jackson, Michigan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-25 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
demolition demolition-notice due-process government-action government-policy municipal-liability notice opportunity-for-hearing parratt-v-taylor procedural-fairness property-rights |
Does due process require the City of Jackson and Jackson County to provide notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case? |
| 18-7026 |
Bryan Coats v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process federal-courts government-action jurisdiction jurisdiction-filing legal-procedure order-denying-rehearing petition-for-rehearing rehearing standing takings timeliness united-states |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the government's actions |
| 18-359 |
St. Bernard Parish, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
catastrophic-flooding categorical-exemption causation constitutional-taking due-process flood-control flood-damage government-action government-inaction government-liability property-rights takings takings-clause takings-liability |
When a government project foreseeably causes catastrophic flooding of private property, is the Government categorically exempt from takings liability … |