relied almost exclusively on Torver's jurisdictional "stipulation" iNvolving the Lortons Facility, Can this stipulatiow legally Torner's case?

Moreover, was the dispositiow a "drive-by jurisdictional rulin" sider it?

Whether the district court's jurisdiction over the case was legally defeated by the defendant's stipulation regarding the location of the offense, and whether the appellate court's disposition was a 'drive-by jurisdictional ruling'