Do the threatened members of the Control Group have standing to sue the President for systematically destroying their evidence and violating the panoply of their constitutional rights?

QUESTION PRESENTED Without a control group to establish a cause-andeffect relationship, ‘science’ is not science; it is guesswork. True science requires control groups. Since the start of the National Vaccine Program (enforced by POTUS since 1962), chronic disorders have ballooned in vaccinated people only, while remaining relatively stable in the never-vaccinated population. Logically, the government should study a control group of never-vaccinated people (Petitioners) or at least not destroy their group. Instead, POTUS has directed and managed his subordinates to vaccinate every American, including the control group — the estimated 0.26% threatened group of healthy, never-vaccinated people. Regardless of intentions, and regardless of vaccine safety claims, the President is destroying evidence. He is destroying control groups’ Fifth Amendment right to exist. The government admits its mandatory vaccines remain unstudied with a never-vaccinated control group, such as Petitioners’ group (“Control Group”). Petitioners’ Control Group is necessary to prove any causation of harm. Government data confirm more than one-half of vaccinated Americans suffer lifelong debilitating chronic disorders (i.e. heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune disorders). Yet, these disorders affect less than 6% of the never-vaccinated, according to evidence the Control Group introduced in the District Court. Petitioners allege this simple observation proves the President’s mandatory vaccines harm most people. Conversely, for POTUS to continue claiming his vaccines are safe and effective still requires a genuine control group. Either way, the Judiciary is needed to preserve the evidence. ii Petitioners requested declaratory and injunctive relief to safeguard their constitutional rights and the scientific method. The lower courts dismissed this case, citing a lack of standing to sue the President, without actually addressing any of the Control Group’s scientific findings or even recognizing the standing nexus itself; POTUS and his subordinate agencies vigorously develop, approve, purchase, promote, administer, and mandate vaccines harming health. Therefore: Do the threatened members of the Control Group have standing to sue the President for systematically destroying their evidence and violating the panoply of their constitutional rights?