No. 23-5106

John B. Freitas v. Superior Court of California, Alameda County, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-07-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-protection due-process equity equity-theft fifth-amendment government-action homeowner-rights just-compensation property-rights takings-clause
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Takings DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation when the government improperly denies a homeowner the ability to use their property as they see fit

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

ISSUES PRESENTED & INDEX TO APPENDICES 1. The conduct of the Justices of the SCOTUS and the judges of the inferior courts merits impeachment and removal for knowingly and intentionally participating in and conspiring to commit the most corrupt, ongoing, continuing, criminal! enterprise in the history of the United States. “The Justices” of the Supreme Court of the United States ““SCOTUS”) and the judges of the “inferior Courts shall hold their Offices during good Behavior”. Article II, § 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the “Good Behavior Clause Doctrine”. (See

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2023)

Attorneys

John B. Freitas
John B. Freitas — Petitioner
John B. Freitas — Petitioner