Wayne Phillip Vance v. Glen Engstrom, et al.
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy Jurisdiction
Does the U.S. government have the right to place citizens and other people in hellish circumstances or conditions without regard for their wealth, safety, and well-being?
ESTIONS PRESENTED ©— _ &. Does THE U.S GOVERNMENT HAVE TRE RIGHT TO PLACE CITIZENS ANDO OTHER PEOPLE IN HELLISH GIRCUOMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS WITHOUT NO REGARDS FOROURWEALTH, SAFETY AND WELL BEING 7 ‘ , Ze DOSS THE US GOVERNMENT HAVE THE RIGHT TD ACT IN ASSOCIATION WITH PRIN ATE INDINIOURLS TO CARRY OUT A SGHEMG TO DEPRING THR | ME, WAYNG P. VANCE SENIOR AND MY FRMILY MEMBERS, FRIENDS, RGLATINGS AND OTHER P EOP CE OF AEG, LIBERTY ; AND PROPERTY THROUGH DEcEePTION OR FRAUD WHILE GNGAGING IN UNETHICAL SQIENTIEL® AND TEQHNOLOGIGAL AGTINITIGS ? Be poses THE Vi S GOVERNMENT HAVE THE LIGHT TO USE TAS PETITIONS PLAINTIFF, ME, WAYNG ?. VARGE SENIOR AND MY FAMILY MEMBERS, FRIENDS, RELATIVES AND OTHER P GOPLE TO HELP THE P GOP LG ADVANCE SOQIALLY AN D ECONOMICALLY WITHOUT COMPENSATING US FOR OUR GREAT SEAVICES; | EEEORTS, ACHICVQMENTS, AND SAMAGES SUSTAINED AS A RESULT OE THE WRONGEVL ACTIONS OF THE RESPONDENT S — DEFENDANTS WHO RAG BEEN PARTICIPATING IN THE DANGRROVS, NLCIOUS) IMMORAL AND OP PRESSING AGH IN ITIGS UNDERLYING THE GLAINS SETESRTHINTHIS CASE 2? 4. DOES THE PETITIONER PCAINTIFE, MG,)WAYNG P.VANGS SENIOR AND Wy FAMILY MEMBERS, FRIENDS; ARLATINES AND OTHER PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO AN GEERCTINE REMEDY BY A COMPETENT COURT OE suSsTICS OR SOIVERNMENTAL AGENCY EOP THE ACTS VIOLATING SUR FUNDAMENTAL RBIGQRTS GRANTED BY THE CONSTITUTION AND OTHER LAWS 96 BUR RESPECTING COUNTRY 7 | cid “A UIST OF