1. Is the rational basis test used by the Panel to ratify
respondent's COVID-19 orders closing petitioners' hotel
and removing its guests overly deferential, abrogating
the Judiciary's role in protecting citizens' rights in a
public health emergency by failing to provide them witha
remedy for the constitutional injury they sustained?

2. Should the rational basis test be a blunt
instrument which ratifies every government action,
however unjust or unfounded, or should it be an active,
probing investigation into the actual realities of the
subject addressed by the regulation, regardless of the
government's proffered reasons?

Is the rational-basis-test used to ratify COVID-19-orders closing a hotel overly-deferential?