No. 21-148
California Restaurant Association, Inc. v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
Amici (2)
Tags: constitutional-law due-process government-action jacobson-v-massachusetts property-rights public-health rational-basis takings takings-clause
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is due process satisfied, consistent with the decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), where a public health department acts based on 'rational speculation' in issuing a public health order that effects a taking of a citizen's right to the free use and enjoyment of his or her property?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is due process satisfied, consistent with the decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), where a public health department acts based on “rational speculation” in issuing a public health order that effects a taking of a citizen’s right to the free use and enjoyment of his or her property?
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-07
Supplemental brief of petitioner California Restaurant Association, Inc. filed.
2021-09-02
Brief amicus curiae of The Restaurant Law Center filed.
2021-09-02
Brief amicus curiae of City of Santa Clarita filed.
2021-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2021)
Attorneys
California Restaurant Association, Inc.
City of Santa Clarita
The Restaurant Law Center
Maurice Baskin — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Amicus
Maurice Baskin — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Amicus