Moose Jooce, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.
AdministrativeLaw Environmental Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether a government official has the power to validate the unauthorized actions of other officials is presumptively determined by the law of agency, specifically the doctrine of ratification
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a government official has the power to validate the unauthorized actions of other officials is presumptively determined by the law of agency, specifically the doctrine of ratification. According to that common law body of rules, a principal cannot ratify the action of an agent unless the principal had the authority to take the action both originally and at the time of ratification. Fed. Elec. Comm’n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88, 98-99 (1994). Although this Court has never done so, the D.C. Circuit applies the doctrine of ratification to uphold government action otherwise unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause. Such ratification will be upheld even if it is a mere “rubberstamp” that does not comport with the procedural and_ substantive limitations normally applicable to the agency action being ratified. In developing this powerful reviewthwarting defense, the D.C. Circuit has, in contrast to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, read this Court’s decision in NRA Political Victory Fund narrowly to apply only in circumstances where the limitation on a principal’s authority to ratify is time-based, as with a statute of limitations. The questions presented are: 1. May a_ regulation be ratified if the Appointments Clause prohibited the purported agent’s exercise of rulemaking authority? 2. If so, must the ratification comply with the constraints that would normally govern an officer’s rulemaking, such as the Administrative Procedure Act’s “reasoned decision-making” requirement? ii LIST OF ALL PARTIES The Petitioners are: Moose Jooce; Mountain Vapors; Rustic Vapors; Dutchman Vapors; Jen Hoban d/b/a Masterpiece Vapors; The Plume Room LLC; J.H.T. Vape LLC; Tobacco Harm Reduction 4 Life; and Rave Salon Inc. d/b/a Joosie Vapes. The Respondents are: Food and _ Drug Administration; Janet Woodcock, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs; and Norris Cochran, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services. Acting Commissioner Woodcock and Acting Secretary Cochran are substituted herein pursuant to Rule 35(8).