No. 22-253

Christine Chui v. Benjamin Tze-Man Chui, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-09-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing government-action guardianship judicial-procedure property-rights settlement settlement-binding
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Related Cases: 22-247 (Vide) 22-251 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether government can deprive real properties from parties without due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether our government can deprive real properties from parties (including wards in guardianships) on complex matters in chambers without any notice, evidentiary hearing, or due process; 2. Whether our government’s officers, including judges, court appointed guardians ad litem, and lawyers can bind real parties to a settlement, by precluding real parties to participate in four inseverable versions adding or modifying 25 new material terms, in chambers, without any knowledge, consent, or participation from real parties, after the settlement was rejected 5 times by the Court, Respondents, and wards;

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-04
2022-12-22
2022-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-29
2022-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2022, for all respondents.
2022-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2022 to November 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2022)

Attorneys

Benjamin Chui
Alex M. WeingartenWillkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Respondent
Alex M. WeingartenWillkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Respondent
Christine Chui
James Glenn BohmBohm Wildish, LLP, Petitioner
James Glenn BohmBohm Wildish, LLP, Petitioner