No. 22-253
Christine Chui v. Benjamin Tze-Man Chui, et al.
Tags: civil-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing government-action guardianship judicial-procedure property-rights settlement settlement-binding
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether our government can deprive real properties from parties (including wards in guardianships) on complex matters in chambers without any notice, evidentiary hearing, or due process;
2. Whether our government's officers, including judges, court appointed guardians ad litem, and lawyers can bind real parties to a settlement, by precluding real parties to participate in four inseverable versions adding or modifying 25 new material terms, in chambers, without any knowledge, consent, or participation from real parties, after the settlement was rejected 5 times by the Court, Respondents, and wards;
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether government can deprive real properties from parties without due process
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-04
Supplemental brief of petitioner Christine Chui filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-22
Supplemental brief of petitioner Christine Chui filed. (Distributed)
2022-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-29
Reply of petitioner Christine Chui filed. (Distributed)
2022-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2022, for all respondents.
2022-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2022 to November 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2022)
Attorneys
Benjamin Chui
Alex M. Weingarten — Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Respondent
Christine Chui
James Glenn Bohm — Bohm Wildish, LLP, Petitioner