No. 19-986
Mary Lou Vosburgh, et al. v. Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, et al.
Tags: civil-rights due-process government-action liberty-interest mandamus name-clearing procedural-rights reputation reputation-harm
Key Terms:
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a government actor deprives an individual of his liberty interest in his reputation, is a state court proceeding in the nature of mandamus to compel a name-clearing hearing adequate due process?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED When a_ government actor deprives an individual of his liberty interest in his reputation, is a state court proceeding in the nature of mandamus to compel a name-clearing hearing adequate due process. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that it was.
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-03
Brief of respondents Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, et al.
Patrick Joseph Fitzgerald III — Girvin & Ferlazzo, P.C., Respondent
Patrick Joseph Fitzgerald III — Girvin & Ferlazzo, P.C., Respondent
Mary Lou, Jake Vosburgh, McHerron
Phillip Geordee Steck — Cooper, Erving & Savage LLP, Petitioner
Phillip Geordee Steck — Cooper, Erving & Savage LLP, Petitioner