| 21-72 |
Khalid M. Turaani v. Christopher Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-07-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
adverse-effect constitutional-rights government-disclosure privacy-act reputation second-amendment sixth-circuit-review standing standing-doctrine traceability |
Whether the standing analysis for Privacy Act improper disclosure claims requires determining if the plaintiff sufficiently alleged an 'adverse effect… |
| 19-986 |
Mary Lou Vosburgh, et al. v. Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2020-02-06 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process government-action liberty-interest mandamus name-clearing procedural-rights reputation reputation-harm |
When a government actor deprives an individual of his liberty interest in his reputation, is a state court proceeding in the nature of mandamus to com… |
| 19-731 |
Pancho's LLC v. James T. Hughes, et al. |
West Virginia |
2019-12-10 |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process federal-regulation notice-and-hearing paul-v-davis reputation stigma-to-reputation |
Does Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976), establish a two-pronged test for a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983? |
| 19-6481 |
Harold B. Rotte v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-11-04 |
Rehearing |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection government-misconduct illegal-immigration irs judicial-review reputation standing tax tax-dispute |
Whether the laws protect Plaintiffs reputation, due process, and are real, or a front, discretionary as if friend or foe |
| 18-527 |
Frank Straub v. City of Spokane, Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
at-will-employment at-will-termination constitutional-rights due-process employment free-speech government-employee government-employment internet-publication liberty-interest liberty-interests reputation stigma stigma-damage |
Whether a government must provide notice and an opportunity to respond before publishing professionally crippling charges against an employee during a… |
| 18-286 |
Abhijit Prasad v. Will Lightbourne, et al. |
California |
2018-09-05 |
Denied |
|
administrative-hearing child-abuse-reporting child-welfare due-process employment equal-protection family-privacy fundamental-rights privacy-rights reputation reputation-harm separation-of-powers |
Does CANRA's post-deprivation hearing scheme violate due process? |
| 18-5194 |
Teofil Brank v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-875d criminal-law extortion hobbs-act reputation reputational-harm rule-of-lenity scheidler-v-now statutory-interpretation |
Whether threats to reputational harm fall within the ambit of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 |