Whether the laws protect Plaintiffs reputation, due process, and are real, or a front, discretionary as if friend or foe

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the laws protect Plaintiffs reputation, due process, and are real, or a front, discretionary as if friend or foe. 2. Whether the FBI knew or should have known illegals were misusing people’s Social Security numbers for employment, and if investigated Plaintiffs complaint, could they have found the unreported income, and that to be a true or false claim by the IRS. 3. Whether defendant, response to Plaintiff 2004 tax year dispute to the U.S. District Court that Plaintiff to be a tax defier, is that single or plural, and connects to earlier false claim of unreported income. 4. Whether the new information of illegal residents not being prosecuted supports Plaintiff claim. IRS concealed the very evidence used to falsely accuse of unreported income, and was not accidental, and now questions if Plaintiff was framed, why else deny due process. 5. Whether the totality of the many false and unproven claims by defendant to be frivolous, a miscalculation, or a relentless pile-on to discredit, to damage reputation and to overwhelm by misuse of power and authority, and why the Court did not except Plaintiff request the totality of all claims the intent. 6. Whether Plaintiff claim for excessive fees that was already part of earlier claim dismissed and now after the Supreme Court ruling on excessive fees, should have been accepted as had nothing to do about taxes, just a pile-on of tax bills to overwhelm Plaintiff, and requirement, the fee be paid before filing new claim to be an unfair block. 7. Whether the IRS, the FBI, the U.S. Tax Court, the U.S. District Court, the U.S. Attorney, the Department of Justice, the Court of Appeals, all involved in this case, working independent and impartial, could have ruled on evidence or is it possible they are giving each other unauthorized and unearned benefit of covering up for each other, from error, favor or misconduct, or as they have done, protect the government whether it difficult be impossible to get a judge to rule against the IRS. 8. Whether defendant response to Plaintiff motion was received in a reasonable time, 7 days out of 10 days, or was deceitful as Plaintiff claims against due process, or should have been able to reply in 3 days, deadline was impossible for Plaintiff. 9. Whether the IRS, their counsels, possessing conclusive evidence, the IRS were they fair and reasonable to Plaintiff, or were they out to destroy, to protect an unfair system. 10. Was the U.S. Tax Court a real court for people who have real disputes, or just for the rich, with their tax avoidance schemes. 11. Whether this court should permit the lower courts to disregard conclusive evidence against the government that helped the government deceive Plaintiff and to avoid the totality of claims. 12. Whether illegal residents were being treated equal or special as Plaintiff had to produce several forms of verifiable identification for employment. 2 ra ) 1