No. 19-731
Pancho's LLC v. James T. Hughes, et al.
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process federal-regulation notice-and-hearing paul-v-davis reputation stigma-to-reputation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976), establish a two-pronged test for a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976), establish a two-pronged test for a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983? 2. Whether the stigma to reputation, in conjunction with a violation of due process rights established by a federal regulation, without notice and the opportunity for a hearing, satisfies a two-pronged test of Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 at 708-09 (1976), and establishes a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-21
Reply of petitioner Pancho's LLC filed. (Distributed)
2020-01-08
Brief of respondents James T. Hughes, et al., et al. in opposition filed.
2019-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2020)
Attorneys
James T. Hughes, et al., et al.
Jeffery Warren Lilly — Rose Padden Petty Taylor & Lilly, L.C., Respondent
Jeffery Warren Lilly — Rose Padden Petty Taylor & Lilly, L.C., Respondent
Pancho's LLC
Sean Jeffrey Sawyer — Higinbotham & Higinbotham, PLLC, Petitioner
Sean Jeffrey Sawyer — Higinbotham & Higinbotham, PLLC, Petitioner