| 23-326 |
Vanessa A. Phillips v. Macon Bibb County Government |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-09-29 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
at-will-employment breach-of-contract civil-rights defamation due-process employee-handbook employment employment-termination first-amendment free-speech unemployment-benefits |
Whether the At-Will employment statute shelters the employer, Macon-Bibb County Government (MBCG), from the First Amendment's 'unprotected speech |
| 23-5005 |
Otis A. Daniel v. T&M Protection Resources, LLC |
Second Circuit |
2023-06-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
at-will-employment civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination protected-class title-vii workplace-retaliation wrongful-termination |
Is it lawful for an employer to intentionally and knowingly discriminate against an employee based on race-national-origin-gender-sexual-orientation? |
| 19-6013 |
Otis A. Daniel v. T&M Protection Resources, LLC |
Second Circuit |
2019-09-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
at-will-employment civil-rights discrimination due-process employment employment-discrimination federal-antidiscrimination-laws national-origin-discrimination protected-characteristics racial-discrimination retaliation sex-discrimination sexual-orientation-discrimination workplace-harassment wrongful-termination |
Is it lawful for an employer to terminate an at-will employee for filing a harassment complaint? |
| 18-1299 |
Marie Gillispie v. Regionalcare Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-04-15 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
anti-retaliation at-will-employment circuit-court-interpretation circuit-court-ruling civil-rights common-law due-process employment-law emtala emtala-statute free-speech medical-malpractice preemption public-policy-exception retaliation statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent whistleblower whistleblower-protection |
Does the precedential ruling by the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals directly contradict Supreme Court precedent and the intent of Congress regarding the … |
| 18-527 |
Frank Straub v. City of Spokane, Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
at-will-employment at-will-termination constitutional-rights due-process employment free-speech government-employee government-employment internet-publication liberty-interest liberty-interests reputation stigma stigma-damage |
Whether a government must provide notice and an opportunity to respond before publishing professionally crippling charges against an employee during a… |