No. 18-7026
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process federal-courts government-action jurisdiction jurisdiction-filing legal-procedure order-denying-rehearing petition-for-rehearing rehearing standing takings timeliness united-states
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the government's actions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : / JURISDICTION [x] For cases from federal courts: ; wee date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case [ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case. [x] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of Appeals on the following date: NES EERBEEY SZ and a copy of the order denying rehearing appears at
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-04
Petitioner complied with order of January 14, 2019.
2019-01-14
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 4, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Bryan Coats
Bryan Coats — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent