Brian Mark Burmaster v. Eli Lilly and Company
Securities Immigration
If a company's manufactured and marketed product is cited by the US Government as a 'miracle drug' to restore a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy and public trial, should the pharmaceutical company issue a cease and desist order to the US Government?
QUESTION PRESENTED The primary federal question that I ask is: : If a company’s manufactured and marketed product, such as Eli Lilly’s Zyprexa is cited by the US Government Quack (called a medical doctor?) as the miracle yO. . drug to restore an extradited criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment of our sacred US Constitution right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, shouldn’t that American pharmaceutical company issue a cease and desist order immediately to that US Government Quack?