| 24-1179 |
United States, ex rel. Ganesa Rosales, et al. v. Amedisys North Carolina, L.L.C., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-05-19 |
Denied |
|
false-claims-act federal-civil-procedure first-to-file-rule government-intervention qui-tam subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether an action asserting False Claims Act claims is a 'related action' under the First to File rule when the government declines intervention and t… |
| 24-705 |
Bud Conyers v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-01-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
false-claims-act government-intervention relator-share settlement-agreement statutory-interpretation whistleblower-rights |
Whether the Government can unilaterally reduce a whistleblower's statutory share in a False Claims Act case through strategic settlement agreement lan… |
| 23-7712 |
C. B., Father v. Vermont Department for Children and Families |
Vermont |
2024-06-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
balancing-test bright-line-rule constitutional-protection due-process fundamental-right fundamental-rights government-intervention parental-rights termination-of-parental-rights |
Whether the fundamental right to conceive and raise children without government interference requires a more objective, bright-line protection similar… |
| 20-6003 |
Alvin Celius Andre v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-10-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-conflict criminal-procedure entrapment government-intervention jacobson-v-united-states jury-instruction predisposition ready-willingness |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit's Entrapment Jury Instruction is in Conflict With Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992) and the Majority of the … |
| 20-461 |
United States, ex rel., Charles W. Houpt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-10-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accountability false-claims-act fraud fraudulent-conduct government-intervention qui-tam-relator relator sba-guarantee statute-of-limitations |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that a three year statute of limitations applied |
| 20-293 |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al. v. New Mexico, ex rel. Hector Balderas, Attorney General |
New Mexico |
2020-09-08 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure federal-judgment federalism government-intervention public-policy qui-tam res-judicata standing state-court |
Whether a state government is bound by a final federal judgment in a qui tam action when it declines to intervene |
| 18-1502 |
Brian Mark Burmaster v. Eli Lilly and Company |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-06-03 |
Denied |
|
6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights drug-marketing due-process free-speech government-action government-intervention government-overreach government-regulation medical-ethics pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-liability pharmaceutical-litigation sixth-amendment |
If a company's manufactured and marketed product is cited by the US Government as a 'miracle drug' to restore a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment r… |
| 18-315 |
Cochise Consultancy, Inc., et al. v. United States, ex rel. Billy Joe Hunt |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-09-11 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (10)Relisted (2) |
31-usc-3731 civil-action false-claims-act government-intervention official-of-the-united-states official-status qui-tam relator statute-of-limitations united-states united-states-intervention |
Whether a relator in a False Claims Act qui tam action may rely on the statute of limitations in 31 U.S.C. § 3731(b)(2) in a suit in which the United … |