Whether the Second Circuit erred in its interpretation of representational standing under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and First Amendment protections against quasi-governmental actors

1. Whether the Second Circuit failed to follow this Court’s precedent when it held that representational standing does not exist in claims alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983? 2. Whether a First Amendment claim is actionable against a quasi-governmental actor whose policies and active partnership with a government entity and actor led to the issuance of a threat of arrest and prosecution aimed at suppressing First Amendment protections that are disfavored as being anti-Semitic? 3. Whether a public threat of arrest and prosecution by a government official against an unnamed yet identifiable group of people constitutes a concrete and particularized injury for purposes of establishing Article III standing and whether the lack of knowledge of which statute the government official intends to use to effectuate said threat prevents the ability to establish an injury sufficient for purposes of Article III standing?