No. 22-6567

Pedro Benitez v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure-act civil-procedure government-action judicial-review standing
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What is the proper standard for determining whether a petitioner has standing to challenge a government action under the Administrative Procedure Act?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Q) Whas Pexwvansen AMSA, TAdled 40 Cixe | — BUORana Comtr PRecedass Daowd y United Stews | Cao) We Moe SwoMiek Co, SVS Yok Faure | SUWNL Woe NAIC Cyr Yee Siockeriod bo / | Ase Ane Seveasee On Lre UNbeehin gy OR eaoe P @)) Whras ive SrBick Couth Savieh Parikiuwer PISS On MF SAl&S OLOWL, ON WhetheR CounSE\ Who We WS by Pecikiuver fo Lie aH . BRAK AREAS Le SABA Copy Lequided Sy Words WH Ei Sened Neon ? ; _ LIST OF. PARTIES , | t . __ IN] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of : : all

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2023)

Attorneys

Pedro Benitez
Pedro Benitez — Petitioner
Pedro Benitez — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent