| 23-397 |
Preserve Responsible Shoreline Management, et al. v. City of Bainbridge Island, Washington |
Washington |
2023-10-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
civil-rights dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking nexus-test nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-exaction proportionality-standard takings takings-clause |
Whether the government may avoid the nexus and proportionality standards by asserting that an exaction resulted from a legislative procedure that invo… |
| 22-1074 |
George Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California |
California |
2023-05-04 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (27) |
cedar-point-nursery-v-hassid constitutional-exemption dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process land-use-regulation legislative-exaction nollan-v-california-coastal-commission pakdel-v-city-and-county-of-san-francisco permit-condition property-rights takings takings-clause |
Whether a permit exaction is exempt from the Nollan/Dolan doctrine simply because it is authorized by legislation |
| 22-6069 |
Rufus Spearman v. Mary Parson, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-11-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-violations district-court dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process endangered-species-act federal-procedure judicial-dismissal nollan-v-california-coastal-commission section-1983 takings |
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision in Wimbleton v. Ospn, 210 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2000), which held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment do… |
| 21-1181 |
Lyndsey Ballinger, et al. v. City of Oakland, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-02-28 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process fourth-amendment nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-rights seizure state-action takings tenant-rights unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether the unconstitutional conditions tests in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard apply to an ordinance that requir… |
| 21-766 |
Douglass Properties II, LLC v. City of Olympia, Washington |
Washington |
2021-11-23 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-scrutiny due-process government-discretion impact-fees koontz-v-st-johns land-use land-use-permit nollan-dolan-doctrine nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-rights takings |
Whether the Nollan/Dolan doctrine applies to impact fees |
| 21-218 |
John Pietsch, et al. v. Ward County, North Dakota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-08-16 |
Denied |
|
dolan-v-city-of-tigard extortionate-exaction fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-takings injunctive-relief nollan-dolan-test nollan-v-california-coastal-commission remedy takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Does the violation of the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine for an extortionate exaction create a stand-alone cause of action? |
| 18-1538 |
Dartmond Cherk, et al. v. Marin County, California |
California |
2019-06-13 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedRelisted (4) |
development-exactions development-fees dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process essential-nexus koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use legislative-exactions nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights rough-proportionality takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether permit conditions are exempt from review under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine when their intended purpose is not to mitigate adverse… |
| 18-54 |
William A. Dabbs, Jr. v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland |
Maryland |
2018-07-10 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
development-exaction dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use land-use-development land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking monetary-exaction nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether legislatively proscribed monetary exactions on land use development are subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional conditions doctrine as … |