Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the unconstitutional conditions tests in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), apply to an ordinance that requires rental owners to make a payment to a tenant before the owners may end the tenancy and reoccupy their home.
2. Whether "state action" sufficient to justify a Fourth Amendment "seizure" claim exists when a law directs the transfer of property from one private citizen to another.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unconstitutional conditions tests in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard apply to an ordinance that requires rental owners to make a payment to a tenant before the owners may end the tenancy and reoccupy their home
2022-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-06
Reply of petitioners Lyndsey Ballinger, et al. filed.
2022-04-29
Brief of respondent City of Oakland in opposition filed.
2022-03-30
Brief amici curiae of San Francisco Apartment Association and Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute filed.
2022-03-30
Brief amicus curiae of Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.
2022-03-30
Brief amici curiae of Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc., et al. filed.
2022-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2022.
2022-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2022 to April 29, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-03-04
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Lyndsey Ballinger, et al.
2022-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2022)
Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc.; Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc.; California Association of Realtors; California Rental Housing Association; Santa Barbara Apartment Association, Inc.