No. 22-6069

Rufus Spearman v. Mary Parson, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violations district-court dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process endangered-species-act federal-procedure judicial-dismissal nollan-v-california-coastal-commission section-1983 takings
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-01-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision in Wimbleton v. Ospn, 210 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2000), which held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not apply to the federal government's actions in the context of the Endangered Species Act, conflicts with the Supreme Court's decisions in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994)

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. 0: inn smd onal Rw ALO | fence nite 4h sit (@ SM, ECan 1),

Docket Entries

2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2022)

Attorneys

Rufus Spearman
Rufus S. Spearman — Petitioner
Rufus S. Spearman — Petitioner