| 23-397 |
Preserve Responsible Shoreline Management, et al. v. City of Bainbridge Island, Washington |
Washington |
2023-10-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
civil-rights dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking nexus-test nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-exaction proportionality-standard takings takings-clause |
Whether the government may avoid the nexus and proportionality standards by asserting that an exaction resulted from a legislative procedure that invo… |
| 18-1538 |
Dartmond Cherk, et al. v. Marin County, California |
California |
2019-06-13 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedRelisted (4) |
development-exactions development-fees dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process essential-nexus koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use legislative-exactions nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights rough-proportionality takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether permit conditions are exempt from review under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine when their intended purpose is not to mitigate adverse… |
| 18-54 |
William A. Dabbs, Jr. v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland |
Maryland |
2018-07-10 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
development-exaction dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use land-use-development land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking monetary-exaction nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether legislatively proscribed monetary exactions on land use development are subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional conditions doctrine as … |