| 24-658 |
In Re Securus Technologies, et al. |
|
2024-12-18 |
Denied |
|
appellate-jurisdiction circuit-court federal-communications-commission forum-shopping statutory-interpretation venue-transfer |
Whether the First Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) by refusing to transfer consolidated challenges to a Federal Communications Commission order an… |
| 23-743 |
Consumers' Research, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-01-09 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (6) |
administrative-law constitutional-law federal-communications-commission non-delegation nondelegation-doctrine revenue-raising statutory-interpretation telecommunications-regulation universal-service-fund |
Whether 47 U.S.C. § 254 violates the nondelegation doctrine |
| 23-456 |
Consumers' Research, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-10-31 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (6) |
administrative-law constitutional-law fcc-authority federal-communications-commission non-delegation nondelegation-doctrine revenue-raising statutory-interpretation telecommunications-regulation universal-service-fund |
Whether 47 U.S.C. § 254 violates the nondelegation doctrine |
| 21-1388 |
Best Payphones, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of New York, et al. |
New York |
2022-04-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
federal-communications-commission federal-preemption payphone-service payphone-services preemption public-service-commission state-regulation state-requirements tariff-compliance telecommunications-act telecommunications-act-1996 |
Is the finding of the Public Service Commission of the State of New York, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Thi… |
| 21-719 |
Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights communications-act confiscatory-rates due-process federal-circuit federal-communications-commission rate-regulation regulatory-taking takings |
Whether the lower court's holding that a regulatory taking claim based on confiscatory rates must be made at the Federal Communications Commission den… |
| 20-1354 |
City of Portland, Oregon, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-25 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
administrative-interpretation administrative-law brand-x fcc-preemption federal-communications-commission local-government-regulation municipal-rights preemption public-property-access statutory-interpretation telecommunications-law telecommunications-regulation |
Did the court of appeals err in upholding the FCC's interpretation of 'effect of prohibiting' in light of its plain meaning, lack of a limiting standa… |
| 20-1159 |
Vermont National Telephone Company v. Vermont Department of Taxes |
Vermont |
2021-02-23 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-communications-commission federal-license nonbusiness-income situs situs-principle state-taxation whitney-v-graves |
Whether the Vermont Supreme Court erred in holding that a federal license, that can be used only in one state, lacks a situs in that state under Whitn… |
| 20-917 |
800 Services, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. |
Third Circuit |
2021-01-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law appellate-review federal-communications-commission federal-courts fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court jurisdiction primary-jurisdiction tariff tariff-interpretation telecommunications |
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Failing to Refer this Questions of Tariff Interpretation to the FCC Under the Doctrine of Primary … |
| 20-743 |
DISH Network L.L.C. v. United States, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-11-30 |
Dismissed |
|
circuit-split common-law-agency contract-interpretation contractual-performance-standards federal-communications-commission performance-standards telemarketing telemarketing-law vicarious-liability |
Whether vicarious liability must be assessed in light of the four bedrock theories of common law agency, or whether a contractual term imposing perfor… |
| 20-308 |
La Boom Disco, Inc. v. Radames Duran |
Second Circuit |
2020-09-09 |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-court-interpretation federal-communications-commission hobbs-act human-intervention random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-definition telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Does the statutory definition of ATDS encompass any device that can 'store' telephone numbers, even if the device does not 'us[e] a random or sequenti… |
| 18-1386 |
Dan M. Lipschultz, In His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, et al. v. Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
brand-x brand-x-test communications-act fcc-regulation federal-communications-commission information-services preemption state-regulation telecommunications-services voice-over-internet-protocol voip-classification |
Whether VoIP service is a telecommunications service or an information service under the appropriate functional test from Brand X |
| 18-6583 |
Dionysius Fiumano v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2018-11-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-1343 criminal-law due-process due-process-notice federal-communications-commission fifth-amendment fraud johnson-v-united-states sentencing-guidelines skilling-v-united-states statutory-interpretation vagueness vagueness-doctrine welch-v-united-states |
Does the undefined element 'scheme to defraud' in 18 U.S.C. § 1343 satisfy Fifth Amendment due process notice requirements? |