No. 20-917

800 Services, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review federal-communications-commission federal-courts fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court jurisdiction primary-jurisdiction tariff tariff-interpretation telecommunications
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Failing to Refer this Questions of Tariff Interpretation to the FCC Under the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Failing to Refer this Questions of Tariff Interpretation to the FCC Under the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction. 2) Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Failing to Recognize the Numerous Instances of Fraud on the Court Asserted by Petitioner.

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent AT & T Corp. to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

800 Services, Inc.
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
AT & T Corp.
Richard H. Brown — Day Pitney LLP, Respondent
Richard H. Brown — Day Pitney LLP, Respondent