| 25-5568 |
Donna Marie Conner v. Xfinity, United States General, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-09-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice federal-jurisdiction pro-se-litigation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the district court properly dismissed Donna Marie Conner's civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and the Telephone Consumer Protection … |
| 24-327 |
Pulse8, LLC, et al. v. Family Health Physical Medicine, LLC |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-09-23 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split commercial-advertising fax-transmission statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-advertisement |
Does the TCPA prohibit sending faxes that do not advertise the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services if plaintiffs al… |
| 24-86 |
Career Counseling, Inc., dba Snelling Staffing Services v. Amerifactors Financial Group, LLC |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-07-26 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
administrative-feasibility circuit-split class-certification fax-machine fax-machine-definition rule-23 rule-23(b)(3) telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether there is an implied 'administrative feasibility' prerequisite for class certification |
| 23-1226 |
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-21 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (7)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law civil-procedure district-court fcc fcc-interpretation hobbs-act legal-interpretation statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
| 23A839 |
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc., et al. v. McKesson Corporation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-03-13 |
Presumed Complete |
|
agency-deference fcc-ruling hobbs-act judicial-review statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the Hobbs Act requires district courts to categorically defer to FCC interpretations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act without independ… |
| 23-552 |
Ambassador Animal Hospital, Ltd. v. Elanco Animal Health Inc., et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-11-22 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split fax fcc-regulation hobbs-act junk-fax-prevention-act marketing telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-advertisement |
Whether the TCPA's definition of 'unsolicited advertisement' permits consideration only of the content on the face of a junk fax or also permits consi… |
| 23-495 |
Lucine Trim v. Reward Zone USA LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-11-09 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-split facebook-v-duguid number-generation random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Does the TCPA's definition of an ATDS require a number generator to generate the numbers themselves? |
| 23A71 |
Direct Energy, LP v. Matthew Dickson |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-07-25 |
Presumed Complete |
|
article-iii-standing circuit-split concrete-injury-in-fact ringless-voicemail telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-communications |
Whether receipt of a single unsolicited ringless voicemail or text message constitutes a concrete injury in fact sufficient to establish Article III s… |
| 23-42 |
Lawrence Pascal v. Concentra, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-14 |
Denied |
|
autodialer automatic-telephone-dialing-system borden database-applications facebook-v-duguid random-number-generator random-or-sequential-number-generator sequential-number-generator statutory-interpretation telecommunications-law telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether equipment that stores telephone numbers to be called using a random or sequential number generator and dials such numbers qualifies as an auto… |
| 22-920 |
ViSalus, Inc. v. Lori Wakefield, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii article-iii-standing civil-rights class-action concrete-injury due-process marketing-communications standing statutory-damages tcpa-violation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether receipt of a phone call after opting in to receive marketing communications is a 'concrete injury in fact' sufficient to confer Article III st… |
| 21-318 |
Mark Leyse v. Bank of America, National Association |
Third Circuit |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-standing congress-lawmaking-authority congressional-intent consumer-protection intangible-harms spokeo-v-robins statutory-harm telemarketing-regulation telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-telemarketing |
whether-congress-has-authority-to-identify-intangible-harms-under-article-iii |
| 21-5372 |
Jessica Graulau v. Credit One Bank, N.A. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-08-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
arbitration arbitration-dispute civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process equal-protection jury-trial subject-matter-jurisdiction telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Did the Circuit Court of Appeal violate the U.S. Constitution and federal laws by depriving the petitioner of a jury trial, due process, and equal pro… |
| 20-1684 |
Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-06-04 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure debt-collection due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment intervention standing telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the Court of Appeals committed reversible error when it denied Petitioner's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a) motion to intervene as a ma… |
| 20-723 |
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency v. Susan Allan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-11-25 |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system civil-procedure federal-regulation number-generation random-or-sequential-number-generator standing statutory-interpretation telecommunications-law telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the definition of an 'automatic telephone dialing system' (ATDS) in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) encompasses any devic… |
| 20-418 |
Melanie Glasser v. Hilton Grand Vacations Company, LLC |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-10-01 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-split human-intervention predictive-dialer random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the TCPA's definition of an 'automatic telephone dialing system' encompasses predictive dialers that automatically dial telephone numbers stor… |
| 20-308 |
La Boom Disco, Inc. v. Radames Duran |
Second Circuit |
2020-09-09 |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-court-interpretation federal-communications-commission hobbs-act human-intervention random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-definition telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Does the statutory definition of ATDS encompass any device that can 'store' telephone numbers, even if the device does not 'us[e] a random or sequenti… |
| 20-209 |
Ali Gadelhak v. AT&T Services, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-08-21 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-split consent database-telemarketing smartphone statutory-interpretation telemarketing telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the definition of an 'automatic telephone dialing system' (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) encompasses only systems t… |
| 19-631 |
William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-11-15 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (19) |
automated-call-restriction constitutional-remedy first-amendment free-speech government-debt-exception political-speech severability statutory-interpretation tcpa telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the government-debt exception to the TCPA's automated-call restriction violates the First Amendment, and whether the proper remedy for any con… |
| 19-575 |
Charter Communications, Inc., et al. v. Steve Gallion, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
automatic-dialing-system constitutional-violation content-based-restrictions first-amendment government-debt-collection-exception judicial-remedy ninth-circuit prerecorded-voice severability speech-limitation tcpa telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the TCPA's prohibitions on calls made using an automatic dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice are unconstitutional content-bas… |
| 19-511 |
Facebook, Inc. v. Noah Duguid, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-21 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (25)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-split content-discrimination first-amendment first-amendment-free-speech government-debt-collection-exception speech-restriction statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the TCPA's prohibition on calls made using an ATDS is an unconstitutional restriction of speech, and if so whether the proper remedy is to bro… |
| 19-496 |
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Thomas H. Krakauer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-10-17 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
article-iii civil-rights class-action concrete-injury due-process judicial-jurisdiction spokeo-v-robins standing statutory-damages statutory-right telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether a bare violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act constitutes concrete injury for purposes of Article III standing |
| 18-1381 |
Supply Pro Sorbents, LLC v. RingCentral, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
advertising-space circuit-split commercial-availability fax-advertisement fcc-commentary incidental-advertisement ninth-circuit regulatory-interpretation seventh-circuit standing statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether an 'incidental fax advertisement' is exempt from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's definition of a 'fax advertisement' |
| 18-1258 |
Enclarity Inc., et al. v. Matthew N. Fulton |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-03-29 |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure commercial-availability commercial-communication commercial-transaction communication-law due-process fax-regulation information-request standing statutory-interpretation telecommunications telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-advertisement unsolicited-faxes |
Whether faxes that only request information and propose no commercial transaction with recipients are 'advertisements' under the TCPA |
| 18-995 |
Crunch San Diego, LLC v. Jordan Marks |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-30 |
Dismissed |
|
automatic-telephone-dialing-system capacity-to-dial circuit-conflict civil-procedure due-process random-number-generator random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-interpretation tcpa telemarketing-practices telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in expanding the TCPA's definition of 'automatic telephone dialing system' |
| 18-778 |
St. Louis Heart Center, Inc. v. Nomax, Inc. |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-12-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-standing circuit-split civil-rights consumer-protection due-process opt-out-notice spokeo-injury standing statutory-damages tcpa-disclosure telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether a failure to disclose information mandated by federal law is a concrete injury in itself, or whether a plaintiff must show additional harm |