No. 23-495
Lucine Trim v. Reward Zone USA LLC, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: automatic-telephone-dialing-system circuit-split facebook-v-duguid number-generation random-or-sequential-number-generator statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent telephone-consumer-protection-act
Key Terms:
Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the TCPA's definition of an ATDS require a number generator to generate the numbers themselves?
Question Presented (from Petition)
question presented is: Does the plain language of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (““TCPA”) definition of an Automatic Telephone Dialing System (“ATDS”) at 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1), and this Court’s holding in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021), require a plaintiff to allege that telephone dialing equipment uses a number generator to generate the telephone numbers themselves, or does it merely require the use of a random or sequential number generator to store or produce telephone numbers to be called?
Docket Entries
2024-01-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-12-06
Brief amici curiae of Wireless Research Services, LLC and Randy Snyder filed.
2023-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 11, 2023)
Attorneys
Lucine Trim
Seyed Abbas Kazerounian — Kazerouni Law Group APC, Petitioner
Seyed Abbas Kazerounian — Kazerouni Law Group APC, Petitioner
Wireless Research Services, LLC and Randy Snyder