dismissal-without-prejudice

14 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
25-5568 Donna Marie Conner v. Xfinity, United States General, et al. Fourth Circuit 2025-09-05 Denied IFP appellate-review civil-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice federal-jurisdiction pro-se-litigation telephone-consumer-protection-act Whether the district court properly dismissed Donna Marie Conner's civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and the Telephone Consumer Protection …
24A748 Meng Uoy Chang v. David Rout, et al. Tenth Circuit 2025-01-30 Presumed Complete civil-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice diversity-jurisdiction federal-question pleading-requirements subject-matter-jurisdiction Whether federal courts can dismiss a civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction when a plaintiff fails to adequately plead a basis for di…
24-267 John Abdelsayed, et al. v. Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. Eleventh Circuit 2024-09-10 Denied Response RequestedRelisted (3) circuit-split dismissal-without-prejudice fee-shifting judicial-discretion prevailing-party statutory-interpretation Does a dismissal without prejudice that reestablishes the pre-suit status quo make a defendant the 'prevailing party' under fee-shifting statutes?
23-6965 Armando Orozco-Barron v. United States Ninth Circuit 2024-03-12 Denied Response WaivedIFP covid-19-pandemic criminal-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice due-process ends-of-justice individual-assessment judicial-discretion pandemic speedy-trial-act Whether a court may extend the Speedy Trial Act's deadlines by general order, without individually evaluating defendants' interests in a speedy trial
22-6416 Nicholas Lee Blair v. United States Fifth Circuit 2022-12-29 Denied Response WaivedIFP 28-usc-2255 civil-procedure dismissal dismissal-without-prejudice federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus new-evidence rule-60(b) rule-60b time-bar Whether a Petitioner can utilize a motion under Rule 60(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or similar vehicle, to overcome a dismissal without preju…
22-571 United States and Michigan, ex rel. Mohamad Sy, et al. v. Oakland Physicians Medical Center, LLC, dba Pontiac General Hospital, et al. Sixth Circuit 2022-12-20 Denied civil-procedure dismissal dismissal-without-prejudice false-claims-act qui-tam retaliation-claim service-of-process statute-of-limitations Whether a district court may decline a discretionary extension of time to effect service and, in effect, dismiss with prejudice a relator's individual…
22-5817 Brandon Craig Wood v. Eric Sellers, Warden, et al. Eleventh Circuit 2022-10-12 Denied Response WaivedIFP abatement administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies civil-litigation civil-procedure collateral-estoppel dismissal-without-prejudice exhaustion full-and-fair-opportunity judicial-procedure Does collateral estoppel bar a plaintiff from challenging the defendants' failure to exhaust administrative remedies defense?
21-7742 Marvel Jones v. John M. Carter, et al. Eighth Circuit 2022-04-28 Denied Response WaivedIFP civil-procedure court-review criminal-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice federal-rules legal-ruling pleading prejudice res-judicata standing summary-judgment Whether a dismissal without prejudice resulted in a final disposition against the backdrop of a res judicata bar
21-7165 Bernard Middleton v. Brittany Greene, Warden Seventh Circuit 2022-02-22 Denied IFP 4th-amendment 5th-amendment amendment-violations article-1-section constitutional-violations dismissal-without-prejudice dismissals-without-notification due-process federal-courts preliminary-hearing Whether the federal courts erred in denying the petition for writ of certiorari despite the petitioner's claims of due process violations, lack of pre…
20-478 CBX Resources, L.L.C. v. ACE American Insurance Company, et al. Fifth Circuit 2020-10-13 Denied Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) 28-usc-1291 appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice finality finality-trap judgment-finality Whether the Supreme Court should abolish the Fifth Circuit's judicially created 'finality trap' and resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals r…
19-8467 Juan Petis McLendon v. United States District of Columbia 2020-05-14 Denied Response WaivedIFP civil-procedure civil-rights dismissal-without-prejudice due-process federal-statute habeas-corpus judicial-procedure mandatory-review speech-trial-act standing statutory-interpretation stricklands-prejudice Does a failure to obtain dismissal without prejudice under the Speech or Debate Act constitute 'STRICKLAND's prejudice' when the mandatory reversal in…
19-659 Miladis Salgado v. United States Eleventh Circuit 2019-11-21 Denied Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) 28-usc-2465 abuse-of-discretion civil-forfeiture claimant court-dismissal dismissal dismissal-without-prejudice federal-procedure judicial-discretion legal-prevailing-party prevail prevailing-party statutory-interpretation without-prejudice When does a civil forfeiture claimant 'substantially prevail' under 28 U.S.C. § 2465(b)(1)?
18-8369 Arthur J. Lomax v. Christina Ortiz-Marquez, et al. Tenth Circuit 2019-03-11 Judgment Issued Amici (5)Response RequestedRelisted (4)IFP civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process jurisdiction standing statutory-interpretation civil-procedure civil-rights dismissal-without-prejudice due-process prison-litigation-reform-act standing Whether a dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) counts as a 'strike' under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)
18-999 Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. Federal Circuit 2019-01-31 GVR Amici (1)Relisted (3) 35-usc-314 35-usc-315 administrative-procedure administrative-review america-invents-act dismissal-without-prejudice federal-circuit-jurisdiction inter-partes-review jurisdiction patent patent-law patent-review-procedure-35-usc-314-315 patent-trial-and-appeal-board standing time-bar Did the Federal Circuit err in concluding that it had jurisdiction to review the Board's decision to institute inter partes review