Does a failure to obtain dismissal without prejudice under the Speech or Debate Act constitute 'STRICKLAND's prejudice' when the mandatory reversal in USCS 2255 act causes dismissal?

No question identified. : | | | Question Pesented _ | Dors a failure to cbtaino dismissal without | | fsspvAice under the Speech Ts al Ack conskitute ISTRICKLANDS peejadice” uben She ondalocy reverie ik USCS Lot3174 ck seq. a pauses dismissal? | : erg) ols Zuk oe — — | : | || , | i ve Felifione dos Pets Mecleedin, is ee i trial detainesot Maryland Correctional | 9s hution Hagerstown, losstted in Hagesstouin | I ne Respondent is the Waited Stobes of America, , [spcessotad by the Salis oc Genesal af ths United — | P ales, located at the Department of Justicr (50 | Pennsylvania Avenug,N.W. Room™ S644, Woshiagton, [P.¢ 20530-0004 | Mhe ace the parties to the preceding in te | Owe -coussd_lbass judgment is ssught to he coined. e his Coust IBELIERMAN vs MONTANA us. is4ueu2am3 3 Kodue\\ v. United Stats ALES TAT Cth 200) —__3_ ~__TERACKSON vs, PARDITS 554 11s $4 (2009) Y MMVNES vs AERNER HON us 519 G972) 8 , HENDERSON vs, WNUTED STAIES Wihus.321(1996) 2.38 | IMASSARO vs UNTIED STATES, 539 us.500 Goes, 0 __[SIVBER vs INTIE)S STAVES 3°10 us. 74°1(1962) CHALE ON G61. 663 (1984) 8 2833 Ov lve avllehed Sts €, BEB FAd 503 (Bh Co, 2011 % | lWorted Stabes, v. Sockson, 22 E hod x 346 (C Cie, 200 WWoited States v, Sondees, S16US. hoo DC AZ Orc.ci.2007) 34 _UNTVED STATES vs TAN OR 487us.326(1998) __27,35,38,34 tan Sates vs Thomas, 305 E bed x WOU" Ge, 2009) Mo {CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISTON( ) fnsoslosst VA ot Phe United States Conshit ion 4,557 | pe STAIUTORY PROWISION(S) | ~ [Nitle 19 U.5.c. 88 346h3174 et seq. } 533 | 4g EXEL STCUONC\ LAW Ser | IBUS.C $3464 (hy | 5 | | ARUS.c. $3162 (2) __ 126,282,384, 311 Hits 22usc. 84254 i agusc 89a, usc Sime 28u.s¢.82255 ss $319,198 20,241,285 | 28usc S255 | 28S.c S225) | ZZ | \ LRG) __ | ocal Rule 45.1 $8(4)(2) of Mos Speeds Trigh IFoo of Noe Vasted Stakes bistich CoukSortne Wished | Q § Columbig — | Wie2 | | aa | Ecol Ru 3 ak Coiminal Troceduce& Rule iG 3,16 Mboited States Supreme Couct Rule 10 Supreme Couck Rule 13 3 | | Supreme Couct Rule 24 4 | | _ Supceme Court Rule 34 42,4 IS Reo. No 46-242, 96 igra) RB IS Rep No. 3-102 of (gma) R33 120 Congcessional Record HATT4-41775 Gam) SM __| MATT8 Gow) | | AaTSs-HIT95 Gon) BM | ; ! | | | a | | | | | | | eee | | Wes TABLE OF CONTENT! — frente’ ___ Pages ortigs In jsdickion _ onstibutional and Stobutor Srovisions Loved ‘les vist Stott Gths (ase 10 Basis Sor Federal Vusisdichion [Dice and Concist Argument fos Nlowonce of the Wert ey 4, ae | | A united States Couck di Appecle Deision Calls ean Exesiseof MA | is Courts Suoscvisory Fosse B. Conflicts with Relevant Decisions of the Supreme Couct ae | CTusgoctuoce Hoe Gurion Rsseated | onclusion ee ’ _ Suc E 2 Court Rule 24Filing of Fetition Sor Weir 2. | ok Cechioraci and Sesvice by Unswarn Declosation | foster Tl 20S 08h _ l