Whether a dismissal without prejudice resulted in a final disposition against the backdrop of a res judicata bar

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . L WHEHER A OM mia WiHoLT PREToOI LE RESUL{ED to A wot F lal DisPosiTiaw AGAIWST THE bACKOROP ODETUIWE OF A RES JuDlcATA GAL, WHETHER THIS CASE PRESETS THE ATE CEDEWT OF WHAT A Compa MUST PLEAD Te OMEN > SAE A CLAIM DWOER FEDERAL RULE oF Civil Proceoune IAC4) J WHETHER A ONmissal WITHOUT PreqUO‘LE UMDER (TATE STATUTES Susoewolws Lil TaT (dels PERions FO THOSE Uae LEGAL OI4AbTLitY, PREC LUOCWGd A NES TUOTCATA Bat WHEE A DMPlAtWT TS SUF Fi cleWT To SURVIVE A Moto > Blows) Iw itis Siw (~ hy! / OTR A” SHont Awd Pll SItTeMewt OF THE CLAIM SHowlwo (Hat THE PLEAvEN Ti Ewflf lea 1 RELIEF, 6, WHETHER UcOEK FEOEINAL RULE of Civil Procédune YICALL) PeEnmit A panty ts bast (HE SAME CALLE OF Aflaw AGAIYGT THE SAME DEFEWORWTS ow A Matton OF bismistac WifdouT PREJUDICE, WHE tHEn Siena TUOGEMEOT T4To be GhawfEn OWLY TF THE RELonO bEFONE THE Count SHows “Hat HERE Ts wo GeWUINE TUSUE AS To Avy maTental FACT. UsoER FEDENAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56 Cc),