| 25A97 |
NetChoice, LLC v. Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of Mississippi |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-07-23 |
Presumed Complete |
Amici (8) |
age-verification content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-speech parental-consent social-media |
Question not identified. |
| 24-53 |
Nathan Miller, et al. v. Republican Party of Minnesota, et al. |
Minnesota |
2024-07-17 |
Denied |
|
campaign-speech civil-rights compelling-state-interest constitutional-law content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-speech political-speech |
Whether state statutes broadly banning false campaign speech are unconstitutional content-based restrictions on political speech |
| 23-1105 |
National Press Photographers Association v. Kelly Higgins, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney of Hays County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
article-iii-standing civil-rights content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions drone-surveillance due-process first-amendment free-speech intermediate-scrutiny standing vagueness void-for-vagueness |
Do journalists and news organizations have standing to bring a void-for-vagueness due process challenge? |
| 22-393 |
NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al. v. Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-10-26 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (6)Relisted (3) |
compelled-speech content-based content-based-restrictions editorial-discretion first-amendment free-speech tech-regulation viewpoint-discrimination zauderer |
Whether S.B. 7072 in its entirety, and its compelled disclosure provisions in particular, comply with the First Amendment |
| 21-8023 |
Xingfei Luo v. California |
California |
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions dating-relationship effective-assistance-of-counsel first-amendment fourteenth-amendment nude-photography nudity privacy privacy-expectation |
Where an individual does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an image, the State's interest in protecting the individual's privacy interes… |
| 21-1229 |
Saved Magazine, et al. v. Spokane Police Department, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights content-based-censorship content-based-restrictions due-process dueling-protests first-amendment free-speech freedom-of-speech press-freedom public-forum qualified-immunity |
Are the expressive rights of freedom of speech and press in the context of dueling protests so well established and particularized that the shield of … |
| 20-1081 |
Illinois Republican Party, et al. v. J. B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-02-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-speech pandemic-regulation political-speech religious-speech strict-scrutiny |
Does the Illinois governor's preference for religious speakers over political speakers survive strict scrutiny? |
| 20-903 |
First Choice Chiropractic, LLC, et al. v. Mike DeWine, Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-01-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
central-hudson-test circuit-split commercial-speech content-based-regulation content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-speech heightened-scrutiny speaker-based-restrictions speaker-identity |
First Amendment challenge to Ohio statute restricting medical practitioner-patient communications |
| 20-569 |
Elim Romanian Pentecostal Church, et al. v. J. B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-10-30 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-exercise free-exercise-clause jacobson-v-massachusetts pandemic-exception religious-discrimination religious-gatherings strict-scrutiny |
Whether the Free Exercise Clause prohibits government discrimination against religious gatherings |
| 19-7544 |
Robert M. Waggy v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-04 |
Denied |
Amici (2)IFP |
constitutional-law content-based content-based-restrictions criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech public-concern speech-regulation telephone-harassment |
Whether a statute that prohibits telephone harassment may, consistent with the First Amendment, prohibit speech on matters of public concern or impose… |
| 19-792 |
Vugo, Inc. v. City of New York, New York |
Second Circuit |
2019-12-20 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
central-hudson civil-rights commercial-speech content-based-restrictions content-based-speech first-amendment free-speech reed-v-gilbert reed-v-town-of-gilbert strict-scrutiny |
Whether strict scrutiny review should apply to government restrictions on commercial speech that do not apply to non-commercial speech |
| 19-575 |
Charter Communications, Inc., et al. v. Steve Gallion, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
automatic-dialing-system constitutional-violation content-based-restrictions first-amendment government-debt-collection-exception judicial-remedy ninth-circuit prerecorded-voice severability speech-limitation tcpa telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the TCPA's prohibitions on calls made using an automatic dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice are unconstitutional content-bas… |
| 19-234 |
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission |
District of Columbia |
2019-08-22 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
campaign-finance content-based-restrictions deceased-donor federal-election-commission first-amendment first-amendment-rights free-speech political-contributions political-parties testamentary-bequest testamentary-bequests |
Whether limiting the size of a deceased donor's uncoordinated testamentary bequest to a political party violates the party's First Amendment right to … |
| 18-1365 |
Mogul Media, Inc., et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-04-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
commercial-speech content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions equal-protection first-amendment free-speech government-speech municipal-government public-forum public-property zoning-resolution |
Does the First Amendment prohibit the City of New York from preferring the commercial speech of its tenants over private landowners' commercial and no… |