| 25A1031 |
Alaska Policy Forum v. Alaska Public Offices Commission, et al. |
Alaska |
2026-03-19 |
Application |
|
associational-privacy ballot-measure donor-disclosure first-amendment nonprofit-organizations political-speech |
Question not identified. |
| 25-882 |
Andrew D. Parker, et al. v. Bill Gates, as a Member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-01-22 |
Pending |
Response Requested |
district-court-discretion election-litigation first-amendment legal-procedure political-speech rule-11-sanctions |
Petitioners brought claims on behalf of candidates in advance of the 2022 election, challenging the procedures Arizona would use to count votes in tha… |
| 25-819 |
Jeanne Hedgepeth v. James A. Britton, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2026-01-12 |
Pending |
Amici (8)Response RequestedResponse Waived |
first-amendment free-speech pickering-balancing-test political-speech public-employee viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether and in what circumstances public employers may discipline employees based on their expression of controversial views while off the job. |
| 25-756 |
Larry Householder v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-12-29 |
Pending |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
campaign-finance extortion first-amendment honest-services-fraud political-speech quid-pro-quo |
The First Amendment's protection of political speech
ensures that a political contribution will not constitute
extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 or h… |
| 25A562 |
Jeanne Hedgepeth v. James A. Britton, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-11-14 |
Presumed Complete |
|
first-amendment free-speech pickering-test political-speech public-employee viewpoint-discrimination |
Question not identified. |
| 25-6115 |
Anton Lazzaro v. LGM Consulting Group, Inc. |
Florida |
2025-11-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights contract-law damages first-amendment fundraising political-speech |
The State of Florida authorizes political fundraising consultants to recover expectancy damages in breach of contract actions against political campai… |
| 25A402 |
Andrew Hess v. Oakland County, Michigan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-10-07 |
Denied |
|
election-recount first-amendment hyperbole michigan-statute political-speech terrorist-threat |
Whether Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.543m, facially and as applied to Applicant's speech, violates the First Amendment. |
| 24-803 |
Michael Quinn Sullivan v. Texas Ethics Commission |
Texas |
2025-01-28 |
Denied |
Amici (9)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
citizen-communication first-amendment free-speech government-regulation lobbying-restrictions political-speech |
The question presented is whether —and if so, under what circumstances —the First Amendment permits the government to require ordinary citizens to reg… |
| 24A494 |
Michael Quinn Sullivan v. Texas Ethics Commission |
Texas |
2024-11-19 |
Presumed Complete |
|
campaign-finance first-amendment free-speech-restriction government-compulsion political-speech registration-requirement |
Question not identified. |
| 24-503 |
Upstate Jobs Party, et al. v. Peter S. Kosinski, New York State Board of Elections Co-Chair Commissioner, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-11-04 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
campaign-finance contribution-limits first-amendment judicial-scrutiny political-speech quid-pro-quo |
When the government restricts political speech, to satisfy the First Amendment, the government must "point to record evidence or legislative findings … |
| 24A266 |
Upstate Jobs Party, et al. v. Peter Kosinski, New York State Board of Elections Co-Chair Commissioner, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-09-16 |
Presumed Complete |
|
campaign-finance contribution-limits equal-protection first-amendment political-speech quid-pro-quo-corruption |
Question not identified. |
| 24-5526 |
Terry Dean Birts v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2024-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
campaign-finance constitutional-rights donation-regulation first-amendment free-speech political-speech |
1) Did the Court of Appeals err in its decision dated May 2025 denying petitioner's petition for Writ of Certiorari under the strict construction?
2)… |
| 24-59 |
Stephen Lynch Murray v. Phil Archer, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-07-18 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure civil-rights color-of-law confrontation due-process fourth-amendment free-speech political-speech speech-retaliation standing witness-confrontation |
When there is speech infringement with arrest, must there be a venue for confrontation and evidence the state did not provide as due, before a federal… |
| 24-53 |
Nathan Miller, et al. v. Republican Party of Minnesota, et al. |
Minnesota |
2024-07-17 |
Denied |
|
campaign-speech civil-rights compelling-state-interest constitutional-law content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-speech political-speech |
Whether state statutes broadly banning false campaign speech, such as Minnesota Statutes § 211B.02, are unconstitutional, if not narrowly tailored to … |
| 23-1215 |
Christopher Deering v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 18, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
color-of-law compelled-speech dues dues-payments first-amendment free-speech political-speech public-employee union union-membership |
1. As a matter of first impression, whether the First Amendment protects a public employee's right to disassociate from a union —by resigning union me… |
| 23-7247 |
Calvin Fair v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
2024-04-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech intent mental-state political-speech recklessness standing true-threat |
When the state prosecutes core political speech as a true threat, must the state prove the speaker's intent to terrorize, or is a recklessness standar… |
| 23A897 |
Brian Benjamin v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-09 |
Presumed Complete |
|
bribery-statute campaign-contributions explicit-agreement first-amendment political-speech quid-pro-quo |
Question not identified. |
| 23A787 |
Ryan Cram, et al. v. Service Employees International Union Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-02-27 |
Presumed Complete |
|
compelled-speech first-amendment government-deduction non-union-employees political-speech union-fees |
Question not identified. |
| 23-926 |
No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act, et al. v. David Chiu, in His Official Capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-02-27 |
Denied |
Amici (8)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
advertising-regulation association campaign-finance compelled-speech disclosure-requirements donor-disclosure donor-transparency first-amendment free-speech political-speech |
1. Whether requiring political advertisers to
name their donors' donors within their
advertisements advances any important
or compelling state interes… |
| 23-6840 |
Suzanne Ellen Kaye v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-02-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law counterman-v-colorado first-amendment free-speech jury-instructions political-speech true-threats watts-v-united-states |
In threat prosecutions where the defendant mounts a political-speech defense, may trial courts—consistent with the First Amendment—instruct the jury o… |
| 22-1199 |
Rogan O'Handley v. Shirley N. Weber, California Secretary of State, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-12 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
censorship first-amendment free-speech government-speech online-censorship political-speech social-media social-media-regulation state-action |
In 2018, California created the Office of Election Cybersecurity. State law empowers the Office "[t]o monitor and counteract false or misleading infor… |
| 22-1033 |
Eugene Mazo, et al. v. Tahesha Way, New Jersey Secretary of State, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-04-25 |
Denied |
Amici (8)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
ballot ballot-restrictions civil-rights content-based-regulation content-regulation election first-amendment free-speech political-speech strict-scrutiny viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether a state that permits political candidates
to engage in core political speech on the ballot may
restrict that speech on the basis of content an… |
| 22-865 |
Mobilize the Message, LLC, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-10 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
campaign-finance campaign-material civil-rights content-based-regulation content-based-restriction first-amendment free-speech independent-contractor independent-contractors political-canvassing political-speech speech-regulation |
Whether regulating canvassing and the delivery of printed material based on that speech's content, function, or purpose implicates the First Amendment… |
| 21-1412 |
Pamela Young, et al. v. Wendy Rogers, et al. |
Arizona |
2022-05-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
defamation false-light first-amendment milkovich milkovich-standard political-speech private-figure reasonable-reader |
1. Whether the First Amendment immunizes a political candidate from a private figure's defamation and false light claims where the candidate publishes… |
| 21-7115 |
Robert Stahlnecker v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-02-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
communications-law constitutional-challenge criminal-law first-amendment free-speech political-speech statutory-interpretation telecommunications |
Does 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) violate the First Amendment when applied to political speech, as it was in this case? |
| 21-1071 |
Stephen Lynch Murray v. Janelle Irwin Taylor, et al. |
Florida |
2022-02-02 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights cyberstalking-statute defamation due-process first-amendment free-speech government-retaliation judicial-discretion political-speech standing |
1. Can the government deputize private actors to
attack political speech and thereby abridge political
speech using law and case law in civil court?… |
| 21-992 |
Dori Yates, et al. v. Hillsboro Unified School District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-01-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
belgau-v-inslee first-amendment janus-precedent janus-v-afscme membership-agreement political-speech public-employees public-sector-unions union-dues waiver |
In Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, this Court held that public employees have a First Amendment right not to subsidize union speech. 138 S. Ct. 2448, 248… |
| 21-779 |
Mark E. Schell v. Richard Darby, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-11-24 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
bar-dues compulsory-fees constitutional-scrutiny exacting-scrutiny first-amendment ideological-speech mandatory-bar-dues political-speech union-fees |
Are mandatory bar dues that subsidize the political and ideological speech of bar associations subject to "the same constitutional rule" of exacting F… |
| 21-712 |
Derrick Tyrone Jenkins v. Florida |
Florida |
2021-11-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
clear-and-present-danger contempt contempt-of-court due-process extrajudicial-speech first-amendment free-speech habeas-review judicial-criticism political-speech |
Does the clear and present danger standard apply in contempt proceedings brought to sanction a litigant's extrajudicial criticism of an elected judge … |
| 21-657 |
Joseph Cecil Vandevere v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-11-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
conditional-speech constitutional-law first-amendment free-speech political-hyperbole political-speech public-concern true-threat |
1) WHETHER THE SPEECH AT ISSUE
HEREIN IS ENTITLED TO SPECIAL
PROTECTION BECAUSE IT INVOLVES A
MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN?
2) WHETHER THE SPEECH AT ISSU… |
| 21-247 |
Coalition for Better Government, et al. v. Alliance for Good Government |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-fees chilling-effect commercial-speech fee-shifting first-amendment lanham-act non-commercial-speech political-speech |
1. Should this Court permit the Lanham Act to be extended to non-commercial political speech?
2. Should this Court permit the imposition of a sanctio… |
| 20-1731 |
Trista Oettle v. William J. Cadigan, Chairman, Illinois State Board of Elections, et al. |
Illinois |
2021-06-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ballot-selfie content-based-restriction first-amendment free-speech political-expression political-speech public-forum viewpoint-neutral viewpoint-neutrality |
1. Whether a photograph of a completed ballot, commonly called a ballot selfie, is a form of political expression in a public forum or a nonpublic for… |
| 20-1678 |
Daniel Z. Crowe, et al. v. Oregon State Bar, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-06-02 |
Denied |
Amici (10)Response Waived |
attorney-regulation compelled-speech constitutional-scrutiny first-amendment free-speech keller-v-state-bar mandatory-dues political-speech public-sector-unions state-bar |
This Court has held that "exacting" First Amendment scrutiny applies to laws that force public employees to subsidize the speech and political activit… |
| 20-1379 |
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Center for Investigative Reporting |
Third Circuit |
2021-04-01 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
categorical-ban commercial-speech content-restriction first-amendment free-speech government-speech political-speech public-forum supreme-court-precedent transit-advertising transit-authority |
1. Whether this Court's decision in Mansky overruled or abrogated the Court's holding in Lehman that transit authorities have the discretion to catego… |
| 20-7555 |
Anthony A. Patel v. Patricia Miller, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
asian-americans civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection mental-health political-speech state-action |
1. Do the federal civil rights laws passed for the benefit of Americans of African descent after the U.S. Civil War also apply with equal force and ef… |
| 20-7450 |
Anthony A. Patel v. Regents of the University of California |
California |
2021-03-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion mental-health mental-health-diagnosis political-discrimination political-speech trump-presidency |
Does the U.S. Constitution permit the State of California to misdiagnose an American Citizen as Suffering from a Mental Disorder for supporting Presid… |
| 20-1078 |
Danyelle Bennett v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-02-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
constitutional-protection first-amendment free-speech hecklers-veto pickering-balancing-test political-speech public-employee rankin-v-mcpherson |
1. Whether, contrary to Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987), a public employee's political debate on an issue of national importance may be silen… |
| 20-1081 |
Illinois Republican Party, et al. v. J. B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-02-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights content-based-restriction content-based-restrictions first-amendment free-speech pandemic-regulation political-speech religious-speech strict-scrutiny |
In Reed v. Town of Gilbert , this Court clarified that content -based restrictions are those that apply to particular speech because of the topic disc… |
| 20-751 |
Ashley Ann Krapacs v. The Florida Bar |
Florida |
2020-12-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
abstract-idea administrative-law bar-discipline civil-rights disbarment due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech free-speech
20-7519" integrated-bar intellectual-property judicial-corruption patent-law political-speech professional-conduct state-action supreme-court-precedent Whether the Supreme Court will address alleged jud |
The Florida Bar, an integrated Bar system under the jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court, has disbarred an attorney who has posted what amounts t… |
| 20-530 |
Harold H. Burbank, II v. Connecticut Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel |
Connecticut |
2020-10-21 |
Denied |
|
attorney-discipline civil-rights constitutional-protection due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech petition petition-rights political-speech |
I. Did the First Amendment and Connecticut Constitution preclude Connecticut from reciprocal attorney discipline predicated on petitioner's Maine appe… |
| 20-264 |
Stephen S. Bona v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2020-09-02 |
Denied |
|
criminal-threat elonis-v-united-states first-amendment free-speech intent-to-harm political-speech true-threat virginia-v-black |
1. Whether, in a case involving political speech, the first amendment allows a state to criminalize a knowing threat of violence directed against a po… |
| 19-1225 |
Paul Hunt v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-04-17 |
Denied |
Amici (8)Relisted (7) |
constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech off-campus-speech political-speech professional-conduct professional-norms public-university qualified-immunity student-speech university-policy |
Whether Respondents violated Mr. Hunt's clearly established rights as a private citizen under the First Amendment by punishing him for his off-campus,… |
| 19-1219 |
Respect Washington v. Burien Communities for Inclusion, et al. |
Washington |
2020-04-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ballot ballot-access civil-rights election-law first-amendment free-speech initiative initiative-process political-speech referendum voting voting-rights |
Whether the First Amendment protects the right of citizens to vote on an initiative that meets all time, place and manner requirements for the initiat… |
| 19-831 |
Adam Jarchow, et al. v. State Bar of Wisconsin, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-01-02 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (3) |
associational-rights compelled-association compelled-speech first-amendment integrated-bar janus-precedent political-speech state-bar |
In Janus v. AFSCME, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), the Court held that State laws compelling public employees to subsidize the speech of labor unions violate… |
| 19-698 |
Wendy Alison Nora v. Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility |
Minnesota |
2019-12-04 |
Denied |
|
administrative-law civil-procedure disciplinary-proceedings due-process federal-courts first-amendment free-speech interpretation lower-court political-speech regulation standing |
Whether Petitioner was denied her Rights to Due Process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when the Minne… |
| 19-670 |
Arnold Fleck v. Joe Wetch, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-11-26 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (2) |
compulsory-funding compulsory-membership first-amendment janus-v-afscme opt-out opt-out-mechanism political-activities political-speech state-bar-association union-fees |
The Petitioner is an attorney who is required by state law to join and to fund a state bar association as a condition of practicing law. He challenged… |
| 19-631 |
William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-11-15 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (19) |
automated-call-restriction constitutional-remedy first-amendment free-speech government-debt-exception political-speech severability statutory-interpretation tcpa telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the government-debt exception to the TCPA's automated-call restriction violates the First Amendment, and whether the proper remedy for any con… |
| 19-5507 |
David Fennell v. Charles Munger, et al. |
California |
2019-08-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment assembly civil-rights due-process election-interference first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech freedom-of-assembly petition-for-redress political-speech |
As part of the #Resist movement, the California Attorney General instituted a policy of arresting his Republican political opponents and banning them … |
| 18-9801 |
RaShawn Long v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-06-25 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech political-speech retaliation standing takings |
does this Constitute a 4th Amendment Violation?
Shoud Inentry Searchr 'Arrest, be Constitutional when Officers mak rr to go?
relief due to "Manifest… |
| 18-1518 |
Save Tacoma Water v. Port of Tacoma, et al. |
Washington |
2019-06-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ballot-access content-based content-based-restriction first-amendment free-speech initiative-power judicial-veto political-speech prior-restraint vagueness |
Whether the First Amendment prohibits a state court from enjoining a qualified initiative from appearing on the ballot because the court believes that… |
| 18-7647 |
Lynn Smith, et vir v. Manasquan Savings Bank |
New Jersey |
2019-01-29 |
Denied |
Relisted (3)IFP |
association codes-of-judicial-conduct first-amendment judicial-conduct new-jersey new-jersey-state-court political-speech revised-code-of-judicial-conduct rules-governing-the-courts-of-the-state-of-new-jer standards-of-behavior state-courts |
Codes of Judicial Conduct and related sources of authority provide standards of behavior for judges and others within the New Jersey state court famil… |
| 18-755 |
Illinois Liberty PAC, et al. v. Kwame Raoul, Attorney General of Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2018-12-13 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
buckley-standard buckley-v-valeo campaign-finance civil-rights contribution-limits due-process equal-protection first-amendment political-contributions political-speech strict-scrutiny |
1. Should political contribution limits that favor one type of speaker over another receive strict scrutiny?
2. Should the holding in Buckley v. Vale… |
| 18-149 |
Doug Lair, et al. v. Jeff Mangan, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Political Practices, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-02 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
campaign-finance campaign-finance-regulation civil-rights constitutional-rights contribution-limits election-law first-amendment free-speech political-contributions political-parties political-speech quid-pro-quo-corruption randall-v-sorrell standing |
1. Whether Montana's base candidate contribution limits on individual and political committees are unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
2. Whe… |