No. 20-7450

Anthony A. Patel v. Regents of the University of California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-03-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion mental-health mental-health-diagnosis political-discrimination political-speech trump-presidency
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the U.S. Constitution permit the State of California to misdiagnose an American Citizen as Suffering from a Mental Disorder for supporting President Trump as the Article II Executive Officer from January 20, 2017 to January 20, 2021?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Does the U.S. Constitution permit the State of California to misdiagnose an American Citizen as Suffering from a Mental Disorder for supporting President Trump as the Article ; II Executive Officer from January 20, 2017 to January 20, 2021? 2. Can State actors label U.S. Citizens as mentally ill when individuals offer bipolar support for President Obama and President Trump from January 20, 2009 to January 20, 2021? 3. Do judicial officers have the power to prevent U.S. Citizens from adhering to the Inaugural Addresses of President Biden and Vice President Harris? 4, Do California residents who supported our 45th president forfeit their rights to due process and the equal protection of the laws under our Constitution? 5. May States intentionally mislabel mental intelligence as a mental illness without duty or obligation to correct errors? 6. Is running for Congress in 2014 instead of practicing law a mental illness in a Nation in which Bipolar Voters flip-flop in how they awarded 306 electoral votes from 2016 to 2020? 7. May the California legal system presume that the best interests of minor children benefit most from their biological fathers being absent from their lives? 8. Can a State misdiagnose an attorney as bipolar disorder for seeing two sides of issues and reasoning both views? 9. May intellect be deemed illness in our legal system? 10. Why is it wrong in California to show basic respect ' for federal judges who were appointed by President Trump? 2 . Petition for Writ Certiorari

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent Regents of the University of CA to respond filed.
2021-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2021)

Attorneys

Anthony A. Patel
Anthony A. Patel — Petitioner
Anthony A. Patel — Petitioner
Regents of the University of CA
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent