No. 21-992

Dori Yates, et al. v. Hillsboro Unified School District, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: belgau-v-inslee first-amendment janus-precedent janus-v-afscme membership-agreement political-speech public-employees public-sector-unions union-dues waiver
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment LaborRelations Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do boilerplate union membership agreements supersede employees' First Amendment rights when it comes to government unions taking employees' money for union political speech?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, this Court held that public employees have a First Amendment right not to subsidize union speech. 138 S. Ct. 2448, 2486 (2018). The Court indicated that it violates the First Amendment for public employers to take employee wages and remit them to unions absent a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of First Amendment rights. Id Petitioners are public employees from Oregon who signed boilerplate union membership and dues’ authorization cards. After the Court handed down Janus, the Petitioners resigned their union memberships and revoked their authorizations for their public employers to withhold union payments from their wages. The respondent School District and Union refused to stop deducting union dues, stating that they would continue to do so until the month of June, the designated “escape-period” for stopping union deductions in the union’s standardized membership cards. The court below relied on Belgau v. Inslee, 975 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2020), in which the Ninth Circuit held government employers and unions need show only that the employee had agreed to be a member and had agreed to pay dues for a specified period of time as part of that membership agreement, in order to continue taking their money without affirmative consent. In other words, Belgau decided no First Amendment analysis is necessary — rendering Janus a dead letter. The questions presented for review are: 1. Do boilerplate union membership agreements supersede employees’ First Amendment rights when it comes to government unions taking employees’ money for union political speech? (i) ll 2. Maya public employer continue to deduct union dues from an employees’ wages over the employees’ objection if the employee signed a boilerplate union membership agreement whether or not such agreement meets the standards for knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver laid down in Janus?

Docket Entries

2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-11
Waiver of right of respondents American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; AFT-Oregon; and Hillsboro Classified United, AFT Local 4761 to respond filed.
2022-02-11
Waiver of right of respondent Hillsboro Unified School District to respond filed.
2022-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2022)

Attorneys

American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; AFT-Oregon; and Hillsboro Classified United, AFT Local 4761
Scott A. KronlandAltshuler Berzon, LLP, Respondent
Scott A. KronlandAltshuler Berzon, LLP, Respondent
Dori Yates, et al.
Timothy Ray SnowballFreedom Foundation, Petitioner
Timothy Ray SnowballFreedom Foundation, Petitioner
Hillsboro Unified School District
Blake Henrie FryHart Wagner LLP, Respondent
Blake Henrie FryHart Wagner LLP, Respondent