Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are mandatory bar dues that subsidize the political and ideological speech of bar associations subject to 'the same constitutional rule' of exacting First Amendment scrutiny that applies to compulsory union fees under Janus?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 U.S. 1, 18 (1990), this Court held that mandatory bar dues are “subject to the same constitutional rule” as compulsory public-sector union fees. In Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), the Court held that compulsory public-sector union fees are subject to “exacting” First Amendment scrutiny. The question presented is: Are mandatory bar dues that subsidize the political and ideological speech of bar associations subject to “the same constitutional rule” of exacting First Amendment scrutiny that applies to compulsory union fees under Janus?
2022-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-09
Reply of petitioner Mark E. Schell filed.
2022-02-23
Brief of respondents Members of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association and John M. Williams, Executive Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association in opposition filed.
2022-01-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 25, 2022, for all respondents.
2022-01-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 26, 2022 to February 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-29
Letter from counsel for petitioner dated December 23, 2021 received.
2021-12-27
Response Requested. (Due January 26, 2022)
2021-12-27
Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. filed.
2021-12-27
Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed.
2021-12-22
Brief amicus curiae of Buckeye Institute filed.
2021-12-21
Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-10
Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.
2021-12-08
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Chief Justice and Justices of the Oklahoma Supreme Court
2021-12-07
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Mark E. Schell
2021-12-07
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, The members of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association and John M. Williams, Executive Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondents Chief Justice and Justices of the Oklahoma Supreme Court to respond filed.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondents The members of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association and John M. Williams, Executive Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association to respond filed.
2021-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2021)