No. 21-7115
Robert Stahlnecker v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: communications-law constitutional-challenge criminal-law first-amendment free-speech political-speech statutory-interpretation telecommunications
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) violate the First Amendment when applied to political speech?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) violate the First Amendment when applied to political speech, as it was in this case? i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States v. Robert StahInecker, No. 5:19-cr-00394-SVW, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered June 22, 2020. United States v. Robert StahInecker, No. 20-50173, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered November 5, 2021. ii
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Robert Stahlnecker
Ethan Atticus Balogh — Balogh & Co., APC, Petitioner
Ethan Atticus Balogh — Balogh & Co., APC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent