Whether the petitioner's First Amendment free speech rights were violated by the respondents' suppression of his political speech and expression

No question identified. : 7 dloys 6 oyguy. v su hyissi siyp laynoys ysads0 Joules go Huh, bu.unp paysod <r 2y0URN 4] CL | Ge PUA ISHOUL 9 ap ye) payJeeng 2g cRuayay jomoys ‘sbuyns JIBUff. Dorper vay dusway uorsseaddng) 4a posoaad wo. ospin wa Ystp f? 494K 26M Of joa]!0f ‘s}unon's4indJ/ aun $4 ™) aud dl fe Byrn fouoypy4Suooun uy Agysnl Op (52421060) Huo} ancy buisn hg (mo) jpunoso 0 OH 2/q0 aq. ERIO poynoys ‘Yannes ‘907 [yusy buaypoyo Of fouhcy Japon bespoog GUY JAAN J} (-F | ZEY2YaN 42 S842N0L paulo hyfua jobai ayy Myysnl ‘soup /2fujealin Jo . ‘ou SHUI) /vi220p hq troyobysenl uygun burg f0 Shoe GABUOH NEY 0 pINoYS ¢f | | joo 4 FAN} JOU porn (IBUID}AP |]4ers! ay sfUDULTI 3IqU4SAAND 2MTY JOU $20 ay 9JaAoasIp G! 4! LAY : gah ‘6U4ND urcuy e700} JO BUI SUE FO MADISON 3 /opO}Sd4I0 JOOY ‘BULLI | bumayaq ur JON POU ‘$d80!44() U3yM POUannpipsuaD 2g PERN, JO YaN0er hugquiny) pynaye (S é Povoynplysuoaun (yas huopoanuy WY 4UDIIIN fom jon, Xe}34) so Ay sox | SIYE $200 40 buryosne hg pohay bun pros [OU Of Pre 2p, ‘Q} 4! SUIr1WO fl (Z' . | CUT YON “Jususfouauyy nh V AMYoudd ely S30 ‘Yorne uopuanuy vo burnp Campa] {ua} soa IA} [90] (HO}}94 Of fO2}MY SIO FP (I a31Nasaud (Nousano : | _ LISTOF PARTIES — { ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . vA All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of , . all