No. 19-5507

David Fennell v. Charles Munger, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-08-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 1st-amendment assembly civil-rights due-process election-interference first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech freedom-of-assembly petition-for-redress political-speech
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does arresting Republican opponents and banning Republicans from running for office or attending Republican political events for life in California violate Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED As part of the #Resist movement, the California Attorney General instituted a policy of arresting his Republican political opponents and banning them for life for running for office or attending Republican : . political events in California. . 1. Does arresting Republican opponents and banning Republicans from running for office or. attending Republican political events for life in California violate Edwards v. South ; Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963)? 2. Did not the act of the Respondent calling the Sacramento police on February 23, 2019, to ‘ have the Petitioner, David Douglas Fennell,a_ popular California Republican Lieutenant Governor candidate, arrested and now banned for life from ever attending Republican political events in California simply because he was trying to run for office against a Democrat he would have beat in a fair election violate the Petitioner’s right to freedom of speech, assembly, and the right to petition for redress of grievances as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments? .

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)

Attorneys

David Fennell
David Douglas Fennell — Petitioner
David Douglas Fennell — Petitioner