No. 20-7555

Anthony A. Patel v. Patricia Miller, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: asian-americans civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection mental-health political-speech state-action
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the federal civil rights laws apply equally to Americans of Asian descent?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Do the federal civil rights laws passed for the benefit of Americans of African descent after the U.S. Civil War also apply with equal force and effect to Americans of Asian descent? 2. May a federal appeals court summarily affirm a case prior to the filing of opening briefs on the merits of the appeal? 3. Can a State or Territory of the United States forcibly misdiagnose an individual U.S. Citizen as suffering a mental . disorder due to his/her desire to run for elected public office? 4. Is running for elected office in our society today a mental disorder which requires treatment and medical care? 5. Is a forced State-mandated misdiagnosis of mental illness and denial of equal protection based on an individual’s race, creed, color or ethnicity a legally cognizable claim for relief in federal court under the federal civil rights laws? 6. Do judges and lawyers acting under color of State law violate the rights of a U.S. Citizen who is peacefully engaged in the political campaign process? 7. Can a State medical doctor or State public health entity refuse to amend an individual’s incorrect medical records? 8. May lawyers and judges rely on erroneous health records in order to deprive an individual citizen of due process? 9. Are Americans better off now in 2021 from California government’s misdiagnosis of appellant as suffering the bipolar mental illness of understanding both sides of the political aisle? 10. Is it a mental illness for a lawyer to aspire to work in public service of Articles I & II of the United States Constitution? 2 Petition for Writ Certiorari

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent Lukas Alexanian, M.D. to respond filed.
2021-04-12
Waiver of right of respondents Wasser, Cooper & Mandles, PC to respond filed.
2021-04-05
Waiver of right of respondents Nemecek & Cole, Blank Rome, and Buter Buzard Fishbein & Royce to respond filed.
2021-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Anthony A. Patel
Anthony A. Patel — Petitioner
Anthony A. Patel — Petitioner
Lukas Alexanian, M.D.
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent
Nemecek & Cole, Blank Rome, and Buter Buzard Fishbein & Royce
Mark SchaefferNemecek & Cole, Respondent
Mark SchaefferNemecek & Cole, Respondent
Wasser, Cooper & Mandles, PC
Jon R. SchwalbachKjar, McKenna & Stockalper, Respondent
Jon R. SchwalbachKjar, McKenna & Stockalper, Respondent