Did the Circuit Court of Appeal violate the U.S. Constitution and federal laws by depriving the petitioner of a jury trial, due process, and equal protection in a civil lawsuit and arbitration proceedings?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Did Circuit Court of Appeal violated U.S. Const. Amend. XII enforced by Fed. R. Civ. P. 38 & 39 after affirmed the District Court’s decision that deprived a civil lawsuit and arbitration issues from be decided by a jury in conflict with Title 9 U.S.C. § 4 and this Court opinion in Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654 (1935)? 2. Did Circuit Court of Appeal violated U.S. Const. Amend. XIV § 1 after affirmed the District Court’s decision that departed so far from due process of law by referring a civil action to a Magistrate Judge without consent in conflict with Title 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed R. Civ. P. 73 and Local Rule 6.05; and deprived from equal protection of laws after referred to arbitration a case excluded in conflict with 28 U.S.C. § 654, Local Rule 8.02 and this Court opinion in United Steelworkers of Am. v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 (1960); Green Tree Financial Corp. Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000) bounded by related case holding A.D. v. Credit One Bank, N.A., Case No. 17-1486 (7% Cir. 2018)? 3. Did Circuit Court of Appeal violated U.S. Const. Article III § 2 enforced by Titles 28 U.S.C. § 1331 § 1343 and “Telephone Consumer Protection Act” (TCPA) when affirmed the District Court’s decision of having lack of subject matter jurisdiction for a TCPA claim to redress constitutional right of privacy and recover private statutory reliefs in conflict with 47 U.S.C. § 227(¢)(5) and this Court opinion in Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC, 565 U.S. 368 (2012) bounded by related case holding A.D. v. Credit One Bank, N.A., Case No. 14C10106 (N.D. III 2016)? i