fcc-interpretation
2 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1226 | McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2024-05-21 | Judgment Issued | Amici (7)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | administrative-law civil-procedure district-court fcc fcc-interpretation hobbs-act legal-interpretation statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act | Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
| 19-413 | Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. Optum, Inc., et al. | Third Circuit | 2019-09-27 | Denied | Response Waived | advertisement circuit-split commercial-communication commercial-fax fax-advertisement fcc-interpretation legislative-history statutory-interpretation tcpa telecommunications-law telephone-consumer-protection-act-tcpa | Did the Third Circuit err by holding that a commercial fax cannot be an 'advertisement' as defined by the TCPA unless it promotes a direct sale of the… |