No. 21-318

Mark Leyse v. Bank of America, National Association

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii-standing congress-lawmaking-authority congressional-intent consumer-protection intangible-harms spokeo-v-robins statutory-harm telemarketing-regulation telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-telemarketing
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-congress-has-authority-to-identify-intangible-harms-under-article-iii

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The text of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”), demonstrates Congress’s determination that certain types of unsolicited telemarketing calls are inherently a nuisance and are harmful within the meaning of Article III of the Constitution. The question is whether Congress, which, as the branch charged with lawmaking, “is well positioned to identify intangible harms that meet minimum Article III requirements,” such that its judgment is “instructive and important,” Spokeo v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016), is to have its judgment respected with regard to the TCPA’s prohibition against the placing of unsolicited prerecorded telephone calls to residential telephone lines. i

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-09-02
Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, National Association to respond filed.
2021-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Bank of America, National Association
Joseph Russell PalmoreMorrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent
Mark Leyse
Daniel Adam OsbornOsborn Law PC, Petitioner