No. 23A839
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc., et al. v. McKesson Corporation, et al.
Tags: agency-deference fcc-ruling hobbs-act judicial-review statutory-interpretation telephone-consumer-protection-act
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Hobbs Act requires district courts to categorically defer to FCC interpretations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act without independent judicial review
Docket Entries
2024-03-13
Application (23A839) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 17, 2024.
2024-03-08
Application (23A839) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 19, 2024 to May 17, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
True Health Chiropractic, Inc., et al.
Glenn L. Hara — Anderson + Wanca, Petitioner